G'day all.
Quoting Jan-Willem Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How about one that's actually H98? The types here aren't *that*
> fiddly... :-)
Well, part of what I was doing was experimenting with what a library like
this should look like, even more than what it should do. For some reason,
I kin
On May 9, 2005, at 8:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all.
Quoting Bo Herlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Great, why not put these together in a first attempt of making a
standard library?
As promised, here's the first attempt:
darcs get http://andrew.bromage.org/darcs/numbertheory/
How about
G'day all.
Quoting Bo Herlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Great, why not put these together in a first attempt of making a
> standard library?
As promised, here's the first attempt:
darcs get http://andrew.bromage.org/darcs/numbertheory/
Cheers,
Andrew Bromage
___
| I'd like to know what the function GHC.Prim.realWorld does exactlly
| in the STG code below:
Think of it as a fixed value. We want the join point $w$j to be a
function, with at least one argument, otherwise it'll be evaluated
eagerly (since it has a primitive type), which is semantically wro
On Saturday 07 May 2005 18:22, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
> On 5/7/05, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hamilton Richards wrote:
> > > Well, for starters, lists and arrays are two entirely different topics.
> > > I've noticed that Haskell newbies sometimes confuse them --possibly the
> >
At 13:08 07/05/05 -0400, David Roundy wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:40:55PM -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> In your opinion, do you think Haskell is appropriate for someone with
> zero math background? I can't imagine how I'd explain something like
> currying to someone who doesn't know math.
I'
Daniel Fischer wrote:
If the algorithm - including dt - is prescribed, fine, but I wonder what sort
of deviation physicists would consider acceptable.
For dt = 0.01, k = 2000 we have a relative error of about 2*10^(-5), is that
within accepted bounds or not? (Any physicists hang about here?)
I
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 05:38 schrieb Greg Buchholz:
> Daniel Fischer wrote:
> > One question: the energy of the system should be constant - that little
> > physics I know. What I don't know is whether the change in energy in this
> > simulation is within usual, reasonable bounds or not. If not, is
