Hi Andrew and Guilherme,
Thank you very much for your advice!
Byung-Jae
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
What's the difference between the ghc6 packages provided by your archive
and the ones currently in Debian unstable?
Abe
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Greetings,
I've set up a Debian archive (apt source) for experimental Haskell
packages and backports. For instance, in the "unstable" section, you
might find bleeding edge packages which will eventually be uploaded to
Debian if they work (like the arrow preprocessor). In the "stable"
section, yo
I would recommend Haskell - The Craft of Functional Programming by Thompson.
Never having programmed in a functional language before, I found it to be a
pretty gentle and informative introduction to Haskell using Hugs.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAI
Hi!
Searching for a new programming language for my
work, I got interested in functional languages.
After several weeks of googling and searching,
I decided to learn Haskell.
I have downloaded and read some tutorials from
the Haskell home page, but most of them are
incomplete and I decided to buy
> But it looks the Graph class works on types a and b
> where a is the Node type where b is the Edge type, or
> just the other way around :), I don't have the code
> right now.
Yes, 'Graph n e' is a graph whose nodes are labelled with elements of
type n and whose edges are labelled with elements o
--- Hal Daume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I think that the
> >> difficulties you are
> >> facing are from the fact that you are trying to
> >> express a purely
> >> functional "updatable" graph.
> >
> > Should I understand from this, that this is a
> > difficult problem and that there exist n
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:07:12AM -0700, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It doesn't provide instances of Num for anything which is already an instance
> > of the other classes. And in Haskell 98 they must be de
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't provide instances of Num for anything which is already an instance
> of the other classes. And in Haskell 98 they must be defined separately for
> each type, instance (...) => Num a doesn't work.
