Hi all,
I'm new to Harbour compiler. Great piece of code !
Today I tried to compile an old Clipper 5.2e program that still works.
I found a difference between the two compilers. I have made a code example.
///
//Use of SET FUNC instead of SET
Hi all,
some ct fuctions aren't recognized by Harbour.
These are
FontReset( )
FontLoad( )
FontSelect( )
I added in .hbp file the -lhbct option, but without success.
Are they not yet implemented or there are new/other functions to
rg
> Subject: Re: [Harbour] difference between Clipper and Harbour
>
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010, Marco Boeri wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm new to Harbour compiler. Great piece of code !
> > Today I tried to compile an old Clipper 5.2e program that stil
e...). Maybe in the future ...
Best regards,
Marco
> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 03:33:21 +0100
> From: dru...@acn.waw.pl
> To: harbour@harbour-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Harbour] ct functions
>
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010, Marco Boeri wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > some ct fucti
Hi,
glad to be of any help.
Marco
> Yes, it's clear now. Just simply the example is too complicated.
> It's not GET or ACCEPT problem but missing ";" => Chr( 13 ) translation
> in __KEYBOARD() function.
> Here is reduced example which illustrate the problem:
>
> proc main()
> __keyboard(
Hi Massimo, all,
snip
with most contrib project you must remember that if you made your sample out
of native directory
you must copy hbmk.hbm and revise or integrate in your project file hbp
I'm new in hbmk2 use and I don't understand its use deeply. Can you be more
clear about .h
Hi all,
I need to know how to show some pseudo-graphical characters like chr(16) ►
chr(17) ◄, etc
In Harbour these characters are translated with a little square. I think that
I'm missing some declaration (like gt or similar) but I havent' found any
informations regarding that.
here is the l
Hi,
obviously, text on images is to be switched... (i'm always in a hurry)
regards,
Marco
From: boeri...@hotmail.com
To: harbour@harbour-project.org
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:59:59 +0100
Subject: [Harbour] pseudo-graphical on screen.
Hi all,
I need to know how to show some pseudo-graphic
Hi all,
is in Harbour docs an ordered list of Harbour extensions/substitute Clipper
functions ?
I searched among the various document but I haven't found anything. Maybe I
haven't searched deeply...
Furthermore, in the doc files the documentation of each function is not
described in depth:
Hi all,
maybe I missed something, and someone has already told it, but I think that the
main goal for a documentation is to be always available, so an online
documentation must be a plus, a side feature of an offline documentation. There
are many files available in the \doc folder but I can't
Hi all,
me and some of my more skilled friends (and programmers) have experienced that
the best technical books/docs are always written in english, so I think the
documentation has to be written in english (by now). I've also examined the
\doc folder and the only subfolder is \en-EN by now: th
> [ There is some leftover from the paste
> Spanish documentation in /examples, if
> there are no objections I will delete
> those, as they are incomplete and
> unmaintained since at least 8 years. ]
I have seen the \es folder in the past but I didn't remember where it was
placed. I remembe
> Of course you are right, the main documentation should be in English
> (but if someone decides to contribute right now by translating the few
> existing docs in any other language, I believe that is not right just
> forbid it).
>
Yes, I see your point and I agree with you.
Otherwise I will mad
>
> We should not forbid any translations, and
> we should think about it for the future,
> but for now we should _strongly focus_ on English,
> unless we want to create 3-4 incomplete
> (but multilanguage!) docs, instead of 1
> complete one :)
>
> Brgds,
> Viktor
Exactly. I fully agree.
>
> It hard to object if you already deleted them an hour later.
>
> You can say that ALL docs are 8 or 10 years old so why don't
> just delete it all and be done with it. Some of the ES docs where
> translation of original EN for standard Clipper/Harbour functions.
> These should not changed i
Hi all,
there is a way to split Changelog in more separate files (i.e Changelog.001,
Changelog.002) to have a smaller current file size ?
Is this name mandatory for SVN use? If not, we may use something like Chang1002
to have a single file for each year/month.
Best regards,
Marco
16 matches
Mail list logo
