[Harbour] GTSLN do not work correctly with EXT_INKEY

2009-08-13 Thread Marco Bernardi
Hello to all , It seems to me that GTSLN do not send properly inkey code like defined in inkey.ch for EXT_INKEY I means CTRL_Y should be code 537 if xharbour is compiled with #ifdef HB_EXT_INKEY, while it should be 25 otherwise. By default xHarbour is compiled using #ifdef HB_EXT_INKEY, so I exp

Re: [Harbour] GTSLN do not work correctly with EXT_INKEY

2009-08-13 Thread Marco Bernardi
tgetlist.prg  so I can make it working  in any case I see that gtcrs instead works. Thank you for clarification Regards, Marco Przemyslaw Czerpak ha scritto: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Marco Bernardi wrote: Hi Marco, It seems to me that GTSLN do not send properly inkey code like defined in

[Harbour] Re: R: xHarbour 1.2 LINUX/UNIX: open file problem ...

2009-07-20 Thread Marco Bernardi
Hello, I am using linux 2.6 and seems it is like you say, close() didn't release lock. I have done following test: I have modified "filebuf.c" blocking the hb_findFile() function... so any use command create a new handle and it should create problems in POSIX locks. I created a short programs

[Harbour] Re: R: xHarbour 1.2 LINUX/UNIX: open file problem ...

2009-07-20 Thread Marco Bernardi
at). What do you think about it ? Marco Przemyslaw Czerpak ha scritto: On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Marco Bernardi wrote: Hi, I think I was not clear enough and confused you so I'll try to be more precise because it may be source of some serious problems. I am using linux 2.6 and seems i

[Harbour] Re: R: xHarbour 1.2 LINUX/UNIX: open file problem ...

2009-07-20 Thread Marco Bernardi
is correct that I do not receive errors in my example when I go to update the record. Thank you for your explanation. When you update filebuf.c I will see inside what modification will be involved.. Bye, Marco   Przemyslaw Czerpak ha scritto: On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Marco Bernardi wrote: Hi, I t