Re: [Harbour] What about a six month release cycle?

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some changes may not be such trivial to add and finish in 6 months. > ... > If we want to release 1.0.n with fixes only then I have to create > new branch for it (1.1.0) where we can make tests, modifications, > extens

RE: [Harbour] What about a six month release cycle?

Hi Pritpal MT is very good news I hope in your support of multiple active windows gt Is still possible? I am also interested to your project regarding gt & hb documentation Best regard Massimo ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http:

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 11:12 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-09-05 11:12 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * contrib/mtpl_vc.mak - Removed recently (and mistakenly) added unnecessary option. [TOMERGE 1.0.1] * source/macro/macro.y - Removed old comment, other part synced with harbour.y. [TOMERGE 1.0.1] * so

RE: [Harbour] Proposed home page layout

I dont like this colour Imo is better usi web2.0 colour -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chen Kedem Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:02 AM To: harbour@harbour-project.org Subject: [Harbour] Proposed home page layout I am not a web mas

[Harbour] hbinet.c, hbtip bugs in 1.0

I've just found a bug in source/rtl/hbinet.c 1.0: HB_FUNC( HB_INETGETSNDBUFSIZE ) { ... getsockopt( Socket->com, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, ( void * ) &value, &len ); #endif hb_retni( value ); < this seems missed } } In contrib/hbtip/tests/tiptest.prg "Retrieve" is missplelled as

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 12:01 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-09-05 12:01 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * source/common/hbver.c ! Version detection fixed for __DMC__ [TOMERGE 1.0.1] * contrib/mtpl_gcc.mak % One unnecessary C -I option deleted. [TOMERGE 1.0.1] - contrib/hbsqlit2 + contrib/examples/hbs

Re: [Harbour] hbinet.c, hbtip bugs in 1.0

Hi Lorenzo, Just commit these to the main branch and "tag" them in the ChangeLog entry with '[TOMERGE 1.0.1]', I'll merge these later to 1.0 branch with the rest of latest changes. Brgds, Viktor On 2008.09.05., at 12:05, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote: I've just found a bug in source/rtl/hbinet.c 1.0:

[Harbour] About DbOrderInfo( DBOI_CUSTOM ) / OrdCustom()

Hi Przemek, I noticed a custom tag cannot be convert to NO custom. It isn't posible due to the synchronization between pTag->Template and pTag->Custom. Is there some way to do it ? Many thanks Juan ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 12:32 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-09-05 12:32 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * doc/whatsnew.txt * Reviewed, some clarifications. [TOMERGE 1.0.1] -- Brgds, Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mail

Re: [Harbour] hbinet.c, hbtip bugs in 1.0

Yes, you are right I correct it Best regards, Miguel Angel marchuet Lorenzo Fiorini escribió: I've just found a bug in source/rtl/hbinet.c 1.0: HB_FUNC( HB_INETGETSNDBUFSIZE ) { ... getsockopt( Socket->com, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, ( void * ) &value, &len ); #endif hb_retni( value );

[Harbour] About DBFCDX custom tags

Hi Przemek, I have a situation with a CUSTOM tag that contains KEY and FOR clause. I think it's a normal situation that OrdKeyAdd() / OrdKeyDel() don't work if the record doesn't respect the FOR clause. When a valid record is modified and it stops to be valid for the FOR clause ... Should no

[Harbour] Consideration about CT function and true windows

Ct function will not seem create true windows (new form) We can even redirect CT3 window functions so with GTs which support many console windows Will WOPEN()create a new window instead of creating virtual window in current screen area Is possible an automatic mechanism of moving/resising windows

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 15:58 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-09-05 15:58 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/source/rdd/dbffpt/dbffpt1.c ! fixed GPF introduced by today MSVC warning cleanup best regards Przemek ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.

Re: [Harbour] 2008-09-05 15:58 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

Hi Przemek, Thanks for reviewing my changes. I actually wanted to make a NOTE to specifically ask for that, but apparently forgot to do so. Brgds, Viktor On 2008.09.05., at 15:59, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: 2008-09-05 15:58 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/source

Re: [Harbour] Proposed home page layout

+1 Pritpal Bedi Szakáts Viktor wrote: > > Hi Chen, > > I like it, simple and straightforward. > > Brgds, > Viktor > > On 2008.09.04., at 11:01, Chen Kedem wrote: > >> I am not a web master nor a graphic designer, but here is (attached) >> my suggestion for a new >> Harbour home page. I d

RE: [Harbour] What about a six month release cycle?

Hi >I hope in your support of multiple active windows gt >Is still possible? For sure, yes. >I am also interested to your project regarding gt & hb documentation :-)) Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-about-a-six-month-release-cycle--tp1931646

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 16:54 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

2008-09-05 16:54 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * contrib/hbbmcdx/bmdbfcdx.c ! fixed to not respect bitmap filters when structural order is scanned, f.e. in OrdListAdd() with active bitmap filter. synced with dbfcdx Prezmek changes * source/rtl/hbinet.c !

Re: [Harbour] Proposed home page layout

Once ready, we can tweak the colors in a few minutes I guess. I don't know what web2.0 colors are, but I'd be perfectly happy with a white background for example. Brgds, Viktor On 2008.09.05., at 11:19, Massimo Belgrano wrote: I dont like this colour Imo is better usi web2.0 colour -Origi

[Harbour] ChangeLog 2008-09-05 17:11 UTC+0200 Lorenzo Fiorini

2008-09-05 17:11 UTC+0200 Lorenzo Fiorini (lorenzo.fiorini/at/gmail.com) * contrib/hbtip/test/tiptest.prg * contrib/hbtip/popcln.prg * fixed typos: "retreived vs retrieved" best regards, Lorenzo ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.or

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 17:41 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

2008-09-05 17:41 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * contrib/hbbmcdx/bmdbfcdx.c ! fixed dirty index reading. Best regards, Miguel Angel Marchuet ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org

Re: [Harbour] About DBFCDX custom tags

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008, Juan Gálvez wrote: Hi Juan, > I have a situation with a CUSTOM tag that contains KEY and FOR clause. > I think it's a normal situation that OrdKeyAdd() / OrdKeyDel() don't work > if the record doesn't respect the FOR clause. > When a valid record is modified and it stops to

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 18:12 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-09-05 18:12 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * contrib/hbapollo/apollo.c * contrib/hbclipsm/gauge.c * contrib/hbct/atadjust.c * contrib/hbct/atnum.c * contrib/hbct/atrepl.c * contrib/hbct/ctstr.c * contrib/hbct/ctwfunc.c * contrib/hbct/dattime2.c * cont

Re: [Harbour] About DBFCDX custom tags

Hi Przemek, I have a situation with a CUSTOM tag that contains KEY and FOR clause. I think it's a normal situation that OrdKeyAdd() / OrdKeyDel() don't work if the record doesn't respect the FOR clause. When a valid record is modified and it stops to be valid for the FOR clause ... Should not

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 20:34 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-09-05 20:34 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * source/debug/dbgentry.c * source/rtl/do.c * source/rtl/xhelp.c * contrib/xhb/freadlin.c * contrib/hbw32/w32_prn.c * contrib/rddads/ads1.c * contrib/hbgd/gdwrp.c * contrib/hbtip/encmthd.c * utils/hbdoc/hbdfr

[Harbour] 2008-09-05 20:45 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-09-05 20:45 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * contrib/rddads/adsfunc.c ! Fixed some more MSVS 2008 -W4 warnings. -- Brgds, Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/li

[Harbour] DES request

Hi Przemek, Forget about the DES request suggestions. I managed to crack the code by adding 1 to the pc1 tables and rotating byte left 1-bit. ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harb

[Harbour] MSVS 2008 -W4 warnings

Hi all, I'm linking a list of all remaining warnings when compiling Harbour with MSVS 2008 with C_USR=-W4 -wd4127 (-wd4127 is to disable warning 4127 'conditional expression is constant') Most if these won't create real life problems, but some of them may (as practice has already shown), so i

[Harbour] Compile error

Hi, this ugly code fails to compile. Is this expected? ---cut--- PROCEDURE CheckState() CLASS TCounter local lBold := ::lBold if HB_IsObject( ::oBtnBold ) ; if !( lBold == ::lBold ) ; ::oBtnBold:Refresh( .f. ) ; endif ; endif return ---cut--- .\counter.prg(115) Error E0004 LOCAL declaratio

Re: [Harbour] Compile error

Hi Toninho, Can you send a self contained example? Brgds, Viktor On 2008.09.05., at 21:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, this ugly code fails to compile. Is this expected? ---cut--- PROCEDURE CheckState() CLASS TCounter local lBold := ::lBold if HB_IsObject( ::oBtnBold ) ; if !( lBold ==

Re: [Harbour] Compile error

On Friday 05 September 2008 02:39:16 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, this ugly code fails to compile. Is this expected? > > ---cut--- > PROCEDURE CheckState() CLASS TCounter >local lBold := ::lBold >if HB_IsObject( ::oBtnBold ) ; if !( lBold == ::lBold ) ; > > ::oBtnBold:Refresh( .f. ) ;

Re: Re: [Harbour] Compile error

>Hi Toninho, >Can you send a self contained example? Viktor, this shows the problems, but for me is so easy correct it in my .prg. I'm only reporting it to see if it is a real problem: ---cut--- #include "hbclass.ch" CLASS TCounter METHOD New() CONSTRUCTOR METHOD Redefine() CONSTRUCTOR

Re: [Harbour] Harbour + GTWVT

Hi hb_gtInfo( HB_GTI_CODEPAGE, 255 ) Regards Pritpal Bedi Daniel Pereira wrote: > > Hi, > > I´m using Harbour with GTWVT. > > When I set a codepage: > > hb_gtInfo( HB_GTI_CODEPAGE, 1 ) > > the Alert function is display: > > ÚÄÄÄ¿ > ³ teste ³ > ³ ³ > ³Ok