Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] to przmek about ordkeyval length
>
Hi Miguel,
> (remember that OrdKeyVal and others doesn't exists at CL52 as you
> know perfectly)
You've added two new RTEs in CDX code in two commits.
Both of these went into the index creation code
(hb_
Hi Miguel,
(remember that OrdKeyVal and others doesn't exists at CL52 as you
know perfectly)
You've added two new RTEs in CDX code in two commits.
Both of these went into the index creation code
(hb_cdxOrderCreate()), so I'm not sure what do these have
to do with 5.3-only OrdKeyVal(). What
Szakáts Viktor escribió:
Hi Miguel,
we are talking about CDX not six.
the question is create incompatible CDX or not create ?
Incompatible with what? I don't really understand what
existing bugs are you trying to fix here to be honest.
(remember that OrdKeyVal and others doesn't exists a
Hi Miguel,
we are talking about CDX not six.
the question is create incompatible CDX or not create ?
Incompatible with what? I don't really understand what
existing bugs are you trying to fix here to be honest.
Instead of revert, i think is better to work by setting. Then people
as you tha
we are talking about CDX not six.
the question is create incompatible CDX or not create ?
Instead of revert, i think is better to work by setting. Then people
as you that prefer cl52 compatible or people that prefer cl53 compatible
if you want cl52 compatible then you need to break Round functi
>As Przemek says, SIX for example doesn't RTE. So this seem
>rather an RDD driver (and/or version) specific property,
>and as such I'd suggest to replicate it that way in Harbour.
FYI ADS doesn't RTE too.
Regards,
Toninho.
__
Faça ligações para ou
Hi Miguel,
Only CL53/COMIX CDX driver generate RT error for keys longer then
maximal
supported length. All other like NTX, CL52CDX, SIX3 (NTX,CDX,NSX)
and
[x]Harbour current code simply cut the index keys to the maximal
length
without any RT errors so I do not know it's good idea. People
Only CL53/COMIX CDX driver generate RT error for keys longer then maximal
supported length. All other like NTX, CL52CDX, SIX3 (NTX,CDX,NSX) and
[x]Harbour current code simply cut the index keys to the maximal length
without any RT errors so I do not know it's good idea. People may have
code which
Only CL53/COMIX CDX driver generate RT error for keys longer then maximal
supported length. All other like NTX, CL52CDX, SIX3 (NTX,CDX,NSX) and
[x]Harbour current code simply cut the index keys to the maximal length
without any RT errors so I do not know it's good idea. People may have
code which
Hi Miguel, Przemek,
? "Length of OrdKeyVal() :" + Str( Len(OrdKeyVal()) )
WHILE ! EOF()
? Right( FIELD->Test, 1 )
DbSkip()
ENDDO
USE
FERASE( "__MYTEST.DBF" )
FERASE( "__MYTEST.CDX" )
? "end"
RETURN NIL
Only CL53/COMIX CDX driver generate RT error for keys longe
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
> OrdKeyVal can't be more large than 240 at cdx almoust in clipper.
Just like in all other languages.
240 bytes is forced by internal CDX structure for 512 bytes
index page length.
You have to be able to store in the worst case at least two keys
in
or better
/* Make sure KEY has proper type and iLen lower than 240 */
if ( uiLen > CDX_MAXKEY )
{
if( hb_cdxErrorRT( pArea, bType == 'U' ? EG_DATATYPE : EG_DATAWIDTH,
EDBF_INVALIDKEY, NULL, 0, uiLen > CDX_MAXKEY ?
EF_CANDEFAULT : 0 ) == FAILURE )
{
12 matches
Mail list logo
