On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> You always remember a name for longer periods.
Tomorrow I will ask my co-workers to show me this feature... actually
I don't know if it is a built-in feature or a plugin... I will tell
you how it really works in VS to populate the code snipp
Hi,
>> Opening via command line as hbide test.hbp .or hbide test.prg
>> so hbide will be also registred to open hbp/prg
>>
>
> Sorry, I do not like this approach.
While I agree that it's not hbide's job to create
registration/association (and it's an ugly as hell
territory plus not portable),
2010/3/11 Pritpal Bedi
>
>
> Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> >
> > Unfinished the sub project/multi project implementation
> >
>
> Did you tried ?
> IMO whatever is defined in .hbp is presented to hbMK2,
> which has the capability of building sub-projects,
> Viktor, update me on this issue.
I remember
>> Did you try HB_INI*() functions?
>>
>
> No, never, I have my own code. I will try.
>
>
>
>> BTW, we're not even obliged to use a relatively
>> complicated .ini format. A simple flat format
>> is much easier to handle. F.e. this one also
>> stays compatible with .ini standard:
>>
>> F.e.
Hi,
>> 1) To fix the foundation and once and for all
>> the GPFs on all platforms / compiler
>> supported by hbide / QT.
>>
>
> Here, perhaps, we need Przemek's help.
> I did whatever I could thought. I have requested
> Przemek for some clarifications, the answer to
> which may lead to re
