Re: [Harbour] Dependences tree like in gcc -M*

2008-05-14 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But in which version? 1 or 2? > Both will give different lists. Sorry probably I misunderstood. It was my impression that you suggested to use an external script "instead" of implementing it inside the compiler. be

Re: [Harbour] Dependences tree like in gcc -M*

2008-05-14 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote: Hi Lorenzo, > In the day by day development is easy to add the new files to the make > files but when a big prg project is ported to standard make system, > writing all that dependeces is boring and error prone. > So you need is to use make clean and ma

Re: [Harbour] Dependences tree like in gcc -M*

2008-05-14 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW for my own use I wrote bash script which creates such dependences list > for .prg files. In the day by day development is easy to add the new files to the make files but when a big prg project is ported to

Re: [Harbour] Dependences tree like in gcc -M*

2008-05-14 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Mon, 05 May 2008, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote: Hi Lorenzo, > This is not a request but an idea for the future. > Tipically an ajax apps made with Harbour is made suing many includes like: [...] > file0.prg depends on file1.ch, file2.xhtml, file3.js and file3.js can > also be included in many prgs. >