RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-10 Thread Bisz István
common thinking, if not please refer to a HOWTO in written form. > > Best regards, > István > > -Original Message- > From: Bisz István [mailto:istvan.b...@t-online.hu] > Sent: 2009. szeptember 10. 16:23 > To: 'Harbour Project Main Developer List.' > Subject:

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-10 Thread Viktor Szakáts
se refer to a HOWTO in written form. Best regards, István -Original Message- From: Bisz István [mailto:istvan.b...@t-online.hu] Sent: 2009. szeptember 10. 16:23 To: 'Harbour Project Main Developer List.' Subject: RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11 Hi, Confirmed on F

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-10 Thread Viktor Szakáts
NULL ); - hb_cmdargInit( argc, argv ); + hb_cmdargInit( argc1, argv1 ); hb_vmAtExit( hbqt_Exit, NULL ); } -Original Message- From: Przemyslaw Czerpak [mailto:dru...@acn.waw.pl] Sent: 2009. szeptember 6. 12:46 To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] demoxbp se

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-10 Thread Bisz István
-- From: Bisz István [mailto:istvan.b...@t-online.hu] Sent: 2009. szeptember 10. 13:52 To: 'Harbour Project Main Developer List.' Subject: RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11 Hi, The segfault error is fixed with the a correction in QApplication.cpp, see below. The problem was with &#

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-10 Thread Bisz István
[mailto:dru...@acn.waw.pl] Sent: 2009. szeptember 6. 12:46 To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11 On Sat, 05 Sep 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, >> Yes, it is normal to exclude the fulstatic case from shared, static and >> f

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-06 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, >> Yes, it is normal to exclude the fulstatic case from shared, static and >> fulstatic test cases. But back to the original issue, why have we >> different > I'm not sure I understand the issue here. I'd still be interested > how can it happen that

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Istvan, On 2009.09.05., at 6:10, Bisz István wrote: Hi Viktor, Yes, it is normal to exclude the fulstatic case from shared, static and fulstatic test cases. But back to the original issue, why have we different I'm not sure I understand the issue here. I'd still be interested how can

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Bisz István
Best regards, István -Original Message- From: Viktor Szakáts [mailto:harbour...@syenar.hu] Sent: 2009. szeptember 5. 17:15 To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11 > Looks that the linking stops on the first not found static library: T

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11 $ hbmk2 -trace -fullstatic demoxbp &>fullstatic.txt /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgpm Quite strange that it gets detected at build time, but not at hbmk2 time. No idea how can that happen assuming the same Linux ins

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Bisz István
lhbpcre -lhbzlib -lm -ldl -lrt -lgpm -static -odemoxbp -L/usr/local/lib/harbour Best regards, István -Original Message- From: Viktor Szakáts [mailto:harbour...@syenar.hu] Sent: 2009. szeptember 5. 16:15 To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
$ hbmk2 -trace -fullstatic demoxbp &>fullstatic.txt /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgpm Quite strange that it gets detected at build time, but not at hbmk2 time. No idea how can that happen assuming the same Linux installation for both sessions. Anyhow it wouldn't work due to the removal of lib grou

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Bisz István
ll -lrddnsx -lhbrtl -lhbvm -lhbmacro -lhbcplr -lhbpp -lhbcommon -lhbpcre -lhbzlib -lm -ldl -lrt -static -odemoxbp -L/usr/local/lib/harbour Best regards, István -Original Message- From: Lorenzo Fiorini [mailto:lorenzo.fior...@gmail.com] Sent: 2009. szeptember 5. 11:03 To: Harbour Project

Re: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Bisz István wrote: > Sorry I should correct me, the error mentioned by Lorenzo appears just in > the case when demoxbp is linked statically, the dynamic version works. I've never tried to link statically ( as far as I'm concerned ). I use: hbmk -n demoxbp -lhbxbp

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-05 Thread Bisz István
xbp.prg ... Best regards, István Bisz -Original Message- From: Bisz István [mailto:istvan.b...@t-online.hu] Sent: 2009. szeptember 4. 19:01 To: 'Harbour Project Main Developer List.' Subject: RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11 Hi, I just finished the demoxbp testing. It w

RE: [Harbour] demoxbp segfault in Fedora 11

2009-09-04 Thread Bisz István
Hi, I just finished the demoxbp testing. It works without the mentioned error with the latest commits and KDE qt-devel installed, but without QT SDK from Trolltech site. Best regards, István -Original Message- From: Lorenzo Fiorini [mailto:lorenzo.fior...@gmail.com] Sent: 2009. szeptem