Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

2010-01-28 Thread smu johnson
Wow, great answer. Maybe I should stop using SIX3 entirely. Any other Harbour compatible database formats you would recommend for the transition, to avoid all these bugs? Hopefully it isn't hard to convert SIX3 to whatever you suggest. If I can keep using a file-based database instead of having

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

2010-01-28 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, smu johnson wrote: Hi, > I appreciate the answer. I don't like hacks either, as I have found some > other hacks that I've had to try to work around. I wrote the EMPTY thing > (as we do use the .ch file) and it solved the problem! So thanks for that. > As far as the questio

RE: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

2010-01-28 Thread ViaOpen - Fernando Mancera
Hello Przemek, > INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG "MIKEY" OF TEMP EMPTY > or is you do not use hbsix.ch: > INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG "MIKEY" TO TEMP CUSTOM > otherwise above RTE is generated. 1052 is CL53 DBFCDX compatible error > when user tries to execute key add or del operation on normal non custom >

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

2010-01-28 Thread smu johnson
Thank you Przemek. When it is done, could you please post in this thread? I suppose then, I would have to figure out how to get this incorporated with the 2.0.0 version of Harbour I am using now on Windows. *many thanks* 2010/1/28 Przemysław Czerpak > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

2010-01-28 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > > INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG "MIKEY" OF TEMP EMPTY > > or is you do not use hbsix.ch: > > INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG "MIKEY" TO TEMP CUSTOM > > otherwise above RTE is generated. 1052 is CL53 DBFCDX compatible error > > when user tries to execu

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

2010-01-28 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Przemek, On 2010 Jan 28, at 11:32, Przemysław Czerpak wrote: > INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG "MIKEY" OF TEMP EMPTY > or is you do not use hbsix.ch: > INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG "MIKEY" TO TEMP CUSTOM > otherwise above RTE is generated. 1052 is CL53 DBFCDX compatible error > when user tries to execu

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

2010-01-28 Thread smu johnson
Hi Przemysław, I appreciate the answer. I don't like hacks either, as I have found some other hacks that I've had to try to work around. I wrote the EMPTY thing (as we do use the .ch file) and it solved the problem! So thanks for that. As far as the question of if you want to implement SIX3 def

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

2010-01-28 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, smu johnson wrote: Hi, > I heard that Przemek is the guru to ask about SixCDX questions from Viktor. > Well I think I have found a Clipper / Harbour incongruency. (or maybe I'm > going about it the wrong way)... :). In the case below, whenever I use 3 > args for SX_KEYADD,