On Wednesday 04 June 2008 08:44:44 am Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> Where?
I think the obvious place would be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Waiting for sunspots.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Barnett
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:27 PM
To: harbour@harbour-project.org
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Release Time
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 05:28:41 am Massimo Belgrano
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 05:28:41 am Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> Do you plan open a fidonet group or something similar for user group ?
> Is possible after new release having something of news in webside?
We can reopen the mailing list harbour-users.
--
Waiting for sunspots.
_
@harbour-project.org
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Release Time
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:15:20 pm Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> I think usenet when write fidonet
> > What about new harbour's web site and fidonet group?
What about it?
--
Waitin
On Sunday 01 June 2008 11:00:58 pm Phil Barnett wrote:
> I know I promised to make the release mark last weekend, but things got in
> the way and this is the first time I've even gotten back to read the list's
> email. Wow, what a huge effort on bug fixing. I'm glad this all made it
> into the rele
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:15:20 pm Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> I think usenet when write fidonet
> > What about new harbour's web site and fidonet group?
What about it?
--
Waiting for sunspots.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http:
I think usenet when write fidonet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Barnett
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:53 AM
To: harbour@harbour-project.org
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Release Time
On Monday 02 June 2008 01:05:15 pm Massimo Belgrano
On Monday 02 June 2008 01:05:15 pm Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> What about new harbour's web site and fidonet group?
What about it?
I thought fidonet died about 15 years ago...
--
Waiting for sunspots.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
What about new harbour's web site and fidonet group?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Barnett
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 5:01 AM
To: Harbour@harbour-project.org
Subject: [Harbour] Release Time
I know I promised to make the release ma
Yes i i want refer Multi Window GT
Situation is Good for made final 1.0 version?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Przemyslaw
Czerpak
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: RE: [Harbour
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> Multi GT is not part of this build?
Multi GT is default in Harbour for quite long time but
I guess you are talking about Multi Window GTs and these
will not be. I'll return to work on it just after final
1.0 version.
best regards,
Przemek
___
Multi GT is not part of this build?
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Hi Pritpal,
> Can you please pull out GTWVT part of GTWVG. I have tried my level
> best but failed in each attempt. OR provide me the guidelines I should work
> over.
> Actually for Multi-Window GT I do not want to ex
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's OK, but I think we should aim for Clipper
> compatibility as a priority.
As you know we have a different point of view about it, so I'll leave
the decision to you :)
> I agree, hbct is the top candidate.
Ok.
be
Viktor:
I think what's happening is that extrap.c didn't make it to the SVN.
Regards,
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Doesn't this break compatibility?
In previous PP ( I guess beta1 and beta2 ) it was possible to continue
a line using ; at the end.
That's OK, but I think we should aim for Clipper
c
Doesn't this break compatibility?
In previous PP ( I guess beta1 and beta2 ) it was possible to continue
a line using ; at the end.
That's OK, but I think we should aim for Clipper
compatibility as a priority.
Well, yes, if we don't want any default choice of contribs.
Another option would b
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't this break compatibility?
In previous PP ( I guess beta1 and beta2 ) it was possible to continue
a line using ; at the end.
> Back to HB_INCLUDE_WINEXHANDLER for a sec, IMO we
> ...
> application, yet the valuab
I would add also HB_PP_MULTILINE_STRING.
Without it valid code of betaX would not compile.
Doesn't this break compatibility?
Back to HB_INCLUDE_WINEXHANDLER for a sec, IMO we
should enable the Win GPF handler by default (without
option), and make it an option to pop a MessageBox()
in case of er
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe only HB_INCLUDE_WINEXHANDLER for Windows, which could
> BTW be made the default.
I would add also HB_PP_MULTILINE_STRING.
Without it valid code of betaX would not compile.
> I vote a 'no' for xhb to be packaged in
Hi Lorenzo,
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as I'm concerned we are ready for release.
Here everything seems ok.
We need probably to decide which are the default flags to use for the
builds and the contribs list to include.
For the offici
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned we are ready for release.
Here everything seems ok.
We need probably to decide which are the default flags to use for the
builds and the contribs list to include.
My suggestion is to include in
20 matches
Mail list logo
