Re: [Harbour] -w3 optimizazion issue

2009-01-07 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Mike Evans (Gmail) wrote: > The right fix is to delete every nvar in your function (as far as I can > understand), but in general if you remove the assignment it will be nice if > the compiler return an error that you are making a concatenation - > calculation on a

RE: [Harbour] -w3 optimizazion issue

2009-01-07 Thread Mike Evans (Gmail)
Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] -w3 optimizazion issue On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Mike Evans (Gmail) wrote: > I think that in this example the warning is ok. You never used this > variable. As I can understand a variable is used only if it's a right > opponent of an e

Re: [Harbour] -w3 optimizazion issue

2009-01-07 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Mike Evans (Gmail) wrote: > I think that in this example the warning is ok. You never used this > variable. As I can understand a variable is used only if it's a right > opponent of an expression or a function parameter (at least on first level > optimization). Yes

RE: [Harbour] -w3 optimizazion issue

2009-01-07 Thread Mike Evans (Gmail)
Hi Lorenzo, I think that in this example the warning is ok. You never used this variable. As I can understand a variable is used only if it's a right opponent of an expression or a function parameter (at least on first level optimization). Brgds Mike Evans -Original Message- From: harbour