Re: R: [Harbour] HB_BYTE vs. HB_UCHAR

Maurizio la Cecilia wrote: I agree with the uniqueness of the type, but i like HB_UCHAR. The 'unsigned' qualifier is declared, despite of HB_BYTE (signed or unsigned?). I know that it's more familiar, but not so precise as the HB_UCHAR (leaving no doubt about the sign). For me, HB_BYTE implies

R: [Harbour] HB_BYTE vs. HB_UCHAR

I agree with the uniqueness of the type, but i like HB_UCHAR. The 'unsigned' qualifier is declared, despite of HB_BYTE (signed or unsigned?). I know that it's more familiar, but not so precise as the HB_UCHAR (leaving no doubt about the sign). Maurizio la Cecilia > -Messaggio