Ok,
it was my system which was "broken" I don't know how, anyway, sorry for the
false report of problems.
Best regards.
Maurilio.
Maurilio Longo wrote:
> Przemyslaw,
>
> at 14236 it is still working... maybe a wrong harbour.dll in my path, but I've
> double-checked and I did not find it and I
Maurilio,
use the "bisect" method... if revision X is ok and revision X+100 is
bad, start checking revision X+50 and you will split the number of
tests by half. Suppose that X+50 is ok, then test X+25... and so on...
Mercurial had a bisect functionality just for this scope...
Francesco
On Tue, M
Przemyslaw,
at 14236 it is still working... maybe a wrong harbour.dll in my path, but I've
double-checked and I did not find it and I always do a
make clean
before every rebuild.
I don't know, I'll keep upgrading/rebuilding until I reach current code and
I'll let you know.
Maurilio.
PS. Maybe
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Maurilio Longo wrote:
Hi,
> Going back at 14230 works ok,
> now I'm rebuilding each one commit from here on, even if reading the ChangeLog
> I don't see changes which could explain my problems.
> I'll let everybody know what I find out.
Check if it's not caused by shared bui
Going back at 14230 works ok,
now I'm rebuilding each one commit from here on, even if reading the ChangeLog
I don't see changes which could explain my problems.
I'll let everybody know what I find out.
Maurilio.
Maurilio Longo wrote:
> No,
>
> there is something more, every .exe in bin fails
No,
there is something more, every .exe in bin fails apart from hbmk2 ???
03-30-2010 13:22:58 SYS2070 PID 75c6 TID 0001 Slot 00b0
E:\REPOSITORY\HARBOUR\BIN\OS2\GCC\HBTEST.EXE
HBTEST->HARBOUR._hb_parvnl
127
03-30-2010 13:26:36 S
Hi Viktor,
I was looking into hbrun issue with the icon when I've found out that an hbrun
I have dated 25 march does not run as well.
I get this error:
03-30-2010 12:36:17 SYS2070 PID 4e34 TID 0001 Slot 00a5
E:\HARBOUR\BIN\HBRUN.EXE
HBRUN->HARBOUR._hb_retclen_buffer
127
Which should mean
