Re: [Harbour] hb_xgrab( ULONG )

2009-12-17 Thread Viktor Szakáts
>> hb_x*() functions are supposed to be replicas of >> std malloc functions, but hb_xgrab()/hb_x[re]alloc() >> expect an ULONG parameter, instead of size_t, like >> malloc do. >> Shouldn't this be (eventually) fixed? > > It should be but for sure not now. > In all supported by us platforms it m

Re: [Harbour] hb_xgrab( ULONG )

2009-12-16 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, > hb_x*() functions are supposed to be replicas of > std malloc functions, but hb_xgrab()/hb_x[re]alloc() > expect an ULONG parameter, instead of size_t, like > malloc do. > Shouldn't this be (eventually) fixed? It should be but for sure not now.

[Harbour] hb_xgrab( ULONG )

2009-12-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi All, hb_x*() functions are supposed to be replicas of std malloc functions, but hb_xgrab()/hb_x[re]alloc() expect an ULONG parameter, instead of size_t, like malloc do. Shouldn't this be (eventually) fixed? Brgds, Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list