Re: [Harbour] hb_gcall() and fwh

2008-09-18 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Toninho, > >Not yet but Harbour is ready for automatic GC activation which I'll > >enable soon. Anyhow it may effect 3-rd party code which keeps not > >attached GC blocks. With current API it can be done quite easy even > >by mistake. > Really the

Re: Re: [Harbour] hb_gcall() and fwh

2008-09-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Not yet but Harbour is ready for automatic GC activation which I'll >enable soon. Anyhow it may effect 3-rd party code which keeps not >attached GC blocks. With current API it can be done quite easy even >by mistake. Hi Przemek. Really the best is enable automatic GC activation, BTW the new MM t

Re: [Harbour] hb_gcall() and fwh

2008-09-17 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Toninho, > I see that fwh continues calling hb_gcall() after each time a dialog > close. It remains necessary in current svn or we have a better choice Not yet but Harbour is ready for automatic GC activation which I'll enable soon. Anyhow it may

[Harbour] hb_gcall() and fwh

2008-09-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I see that fwh continues calling hb_gcall() after each time a dialog close. It remains necessary in current svn or we have a better choice ? TIA and regards, Toninho. ___ Yahoo! Mail - Sempre a melhor opção para você! Experimente já e vej