Re: [Harbour] hb_errFuncname question

2008-06-10 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, Thanks for clarfiying. I'm committing then. Few redundant Ks saved in final executable. There were just a few changes in low level code, I hope they're alright. Brgds, Viktor On 2008.06.10., at 11:08, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: On Mon, 09 Jun 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor

Re: [Harbour] hb_errFuncname question

2008-06-10 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > >Please only remember that in few cases we are not showing > >call stack function name so literal string should be left > >in them. > Can you tell some examples? > I'd like to see all the consequences before updating code > with this. F.e.

Re: [Harbour] hb_errFuncname question

2008-06-09 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, I'd like to avoid replicating the function name in every hb_errRT*() calls, since it's consuming string space, is a PITA to type in, and it's just another thing to mistype. Please only remember that in few cases we are not showing call stack function name so literal string should

Re: [Harbour] hb_errFuncname question

2008-06-09 Thread Szakáts Viktor
No problem at all, I'll give it a shot anyway for some files, so it doesn't take anything to update it in whole Harbour. Brgds, Viktor On 2008.06.09., at 22:06, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: On Mon, 09 Jun 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, Please only remember that in few cases we are not

Re: [Harbour] hb_errFuncname question

2008-06-09 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > >Please only remember that in few cases we are not showing > >call stack function name so literal string should be left > >in them. > Many thanks, I did your modifications. > We may remove hb_errFuncName after changing references, right? If

Re: [Harbour] hb_errFuncname question

2008-06-09 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, I'd like to avoid replicating the function name in every hb_errRT*() calls, since it's consuming string space, is a PITA to type in, and it's just another thing to mistype. Please only remember that in few cases we are not showing call stack function name so literal string should

Re: [Harbour] hb_errFuncname question

2008-06-09 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > I'd like to avoid replicating the function name > in every hb_errRT*() calls, since it's consuming > string space, is a PITA to type in, and it's just > another thing to mistype. Please only remember that in few cases we are not showing cal

[Harbour] hb_errFuncname question

2008-06-08 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, I'd like to avoid replicating the function name in every hb_errRT*() calls, since it's consuming string space, is a PITA to type in, and it's just another thing to mistype. So, I've noticed code which uses &hb_errFuncname instead. Is this safe to use by external code (contrib)? Would