On 06/14/2009 03:24 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
We also have the "missing name" problem with our existing mailing
list
archive. It has been reported her a few times as a problem, but you
didn't answer to these, maybe you missed it, or is this feature
intentional?
It makes very strange to look
On 06/14/2009 03:24 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
We also have the "missing name" problem with our existing mailing list
archive. It has been reported her a few times as a problem, but you
didn't answer to these, maybe you missed it, or is this feature intentional?
It makes very strange to look at me
I agree with Viktor post+1 for better forum harbour user
2009/6/14 Viktor Szakáts
> Hi Phil and All,
>
> Newsgroups are definitely dead (my ISP never properly supported it,
> so there is nothing to drop here ;).
>
> For me there are a few big difference between mailing lists and forums:
>
> - F
- First is that mailing lists *require* a much higher level of
involvement
than mailing list. What I mean, is that you *have to* subscribe
first, from
..than forums. of course.
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
htt
Hi Phil and All,
Newsgroups are definitely dead (my ISP never properly supported it,
so there is nothing to drop here ;).
For me there are a few big difference between mailing lists and forums:
- First is that mailing lists *require* a much higher level of involvement
than mailing list. What I m
On 06/10/2009 09:45 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
I don't think Harbour issues are unwelcome on the xHarbour group,
but it may confuse people.
I think the ideal would be able to count on a structure itself, so we
can concentrate on our project without having to give support or get
information about
FYI: phpBB is available on sf.net as an option.
On 2009.06.10., at 15:45, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
I don't think Harbour issues are unwelcome on the xHarbour group,
but it may confuse people.
I think the ideal would be able to count on a structure itself, so we
can concentrate on our project w
I don't think Harbour issues are unwelcome on the xHarbour group,
but it may confuse people.
I think the ideal would be able to count on a structure itself, so we
can concentrate on our project without having to give support or get
information about other tools like xHarbour. Because the philoso
> I don't think Harbour issues are unwelcome on the xHarbour group, but it may
> confuse people.
I think the ideal would be able to count on a structure itself, so we
can concentrate on our project without having to give support or get
information about other tools like xHarbour. Because the philo
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
comp.lang.clipper is quite underused these days, and most ppl
want to know how to run his stuff on XP/Vista etc. So Harbour may
not be very alien there.
I would be glad to see the traffic pick up there, I'm rather fond of it.
I don't think Harbour issues are unwelcome on
> i think better comp.lang.harbour
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/creating-newsgroups/part1/
Too tired to absorb that. If someone is willing to manage
the request it would be very good though.
> as alternative we can also create a google or Yahoo group that allow
> posting,web access, mail a
i think better comp.lang.harbour
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/creating-newsgroups/part1/
as alternative we can also create a google or Yahoo group that allow
posting,web access, mail access, attachment, file upload sharing, a
public page.Yahoo also photo gallery and pool
either require registr
> Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>>
>> May I link comp.lang.clipper as the public forum for Harbour users in
>> INSTALL?
>>
>> Are we willing to use that space for user level Harbour support?
>>
>
> It is a wise step.
>
> The alternative could be we request USENET for comp.lang.harbour
> though their minimu
Hello
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> May I link comp.lang.clipper as the public forum for Harbour users in
> INSTALL?
>
> Are we willing to use that space for user level Harbour support?
>
It is a wise step.
The alternative could be we request USENET for comp.lang.harbour
though their minimum r
Hi All,
May I link comp.lang.clipper as the public forum for Harbour users in INSTALL?
Are we willing to use that space for user level Harbour support?
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/
Hi Alex,
That's perfect, thanks a lot.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.09.19., at 17:08, Alex Strickland wrote:
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Not at all, very good idea.
I basically used your release wording, and added a little:
To all
Harbour: 1.0.1 released (2008-09-18 18:41)
The Harbour Project is a
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Not at all, very good idea.
I basically used your release wording, and added a little:
To all
Harbour: 1.0.1 released (2008-09-18 18:41)
The Harbour Project is a Free Open Source Software effort to build a
multiplatform Clipper language compiler. Harbour consists of t
users
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
Strickland
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 2:16 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: [Harbour] comp.lang.clipper
Hi
Does anyone have any objections to me putting a short note on
com
Absolutly but is only a suggestion
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lorenzo
Fiorini
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 2:48 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] comp.lang.clipper
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:26 PM
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Massimo Belgrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you thiunk of :
>
> Harbour community is pleased to announce that a major release of the
> harbour: vesion 1.0.0.
> ...
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour-users
Massimo, don't you thin
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
Strickland
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 2:16 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: [Harbour] comp.lang.clipper
Hi
Does anyone have any objections to me putting a short note on
comp.lang.clipper outlining the significant milestones recently pas
Hi Alex,
Not at all, very good idea.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.09.19., at 14:15, Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi
Does anyone have any objections to me putting a short note on
comp.lang.clipper outlining the significant milestones recently
passed and the new mt stuff?
Unless I missed something al
Hi
Does anyone have any objections to me putting a short note on
comp.lang.clipper outlining the significant milestones recently passed
and the new mt stuff?
Unless I missed something already.
Regards
Alex
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-p
23 matches
Mail list logo
