Re: [Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-08 Thread Viktor Szakáts
>> Wich other harbour part need be rewritten from scratch? > > I can't think of any other. I've found three: - XML handling in xhb lib, but that rather needs a reimplementation in core. - .dll support in hbwin. (the x86 part) - SORT command ( + ACHOICE() and MEMOEDIT() of course) Brgds, Vik

Re: [Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-06 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> Wich other harbour part need be rewritten from scratch? I can't think of any other. > rewriting will allow also a true and native GUI mode? It has nothing to do with GUI mode. These are Clipper functions, and if rewriting them, the only one goal is to implement them as close as possible to

Re: [Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-06 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Wich other harbour part need be rewritten from scratch? rewriting will allow also a true and native GUI mode? think how memoedit seem to windows user for select/copy/past operation 2010/2/6 Viktor Szakáts : >> I am curious about this ACHOICE stuff.  It sounds as though Przemek thought >> it neede

Re: [Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-06 Thread smu johnson
In order to do a lot of the other Clipper implementations, did the Harbour Project reverse engineer Clipper code, or was some source code donated from the original Clipper company? In this instance, would you have to just take an approximate guess as to how ACHOICE functions under any circumstance

Re: [Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-06 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> I am curious about this ACHOICE stuff. It sounds as though Przemek thought > it needed to be rewritten from scratch. Is that a big project to do, or > likely to be done? I'm starting to think I'd be a lot more useful to the > Harbour Project if I was a good C programmer. ACHOICE() (and als

Re: [Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-06 Thread smu johnson
I am curious about this ACHOICE stuff. It sounds as though Przemek thought it needed to be rewritten from scratch. Is that a big project to do, or likely to be done? I'm starting to think I'd be a lot more useful to the Harbour Project if I was a good C programmer. On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:30 A

Re: [Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-06 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi, I didn't miss them, but what I reported look like new errors after recent patches. Just run ac_test.prg, press , then -> RTE. It was okay in 2.0.0, but it's not okay in current trunk. Brgds, Viktor On 2010 Feb 6, at 16:22, smu johnson wrote: > Hi Viktor, see: > > http://lists.harbour-p

Re: [Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-06 Thread smu johnson
Hi Viktor, see: http://lists.harbour-project.org/pipermail/harbour/2010-February/031590.html http://lists.harbour-project.org/pipermail/harbour/2010-February/031661.html In case you missed them. On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote: > Hi All, > > In recent SVN, tests/ac_test.p

[Harbour] bug: ACHOICE()

2010-02-06 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi All, In recent SVN, tests/ac_test.prg shows some problems with ACHOICE(). It doesn't initially show to selecting and RTEs (Bound Error) after moving around. Brgds, Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-proj