Re: [Harbour] about xharbour compact.

2010-01-05 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010, WenSheng wrote: Hi, > But, I have read Clipper 5.3 Guide and show: > AT(, ) --> nPosition > The original function of only two parameters. Exactly like in Harbour. It also has only two parameters. > Why do we have to custom order it? Sorry but I do not understand what you a

Re: [Harbour] about xharbour compact.

2010-01-05 Thread WenSheng
But, I have read Clipper 5.3 Guide and show: AT(, ) --> nPosition The original function of only two parameters. Why do we have to custom order it? > > > I have a function 'AT()' can not be compiler, > > I use 'nPos := At( ';', cPrinters, nStart )', > > If I have not joined a custom function,

Re: [Harbour] about xharbour compact.

2010-01-04 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010, WenSheng wrote: Hi, > I have a function 'AT()' can not be compiler, > I use 'nPos := At( ';', cPrinters, nStart )', > If I have not joined a custom function, I will be unable to successfully > compile the code. > #xtranslate At(,) => hb_At(,) > Who can I ask this gra

[Harbour] about xharbour compact.

2010-01-04 Thread WenSheng
Hi all; I have a function 'AT()' can not be compiler, I use 'nPos := At( ';', cPrinters, nStart )', If I have not joined a custom function, I will be unable to successfully compile the code. #xtranslate At(,) => hb_At(,) Who can I ask this grammar by adding "hbcompat.ch" do?