Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Andi Jahja
> > IMO, we should just add the missing function as Viktor suggested, rather > > than deleting the whole things. > > > > Commited vide r13343. > Please make tests to check if everything is ok. Checked and everything is OK. Thanks. -- Andi ___ Harbour m

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hi Andi Jahja-2 wrote: > > IMO, we should just add the missing function as Viktor suggested, rather > than deleting the whole things. > Commited vide r13343. Please make tests to check if everything is ok. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Tagging

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Andi Jahja
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:43:22 -0800 (PST) Pritpal Bedi wrote: > We excluded only. > Do we need to exclude anyway? > I heard no comments in this regard so far. > IMO, we should just add the missing function as Viktor suggested, rather than deleting the whole things. -- Andi _

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Andi Jahja
> QHttpHeader seems to be part of QNetwork, but it's > missing from HBQT. > > I think it's enough to add it, rather than deleting > whole QNetwork lib. This is another option which is much better. -- Andi ___ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limi

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hi Viktor Szakáts wrote: > >> We excluded only. >> Do we need to exclude anyway? >> I heard no comments in this regard so far. > > QHttpHeader seems to be part of QNetwork, but it's > missing from HBQT. > > I think it's enough to add it, rather than deleting > whole QNetwork lib. > Oh,

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote: > Pls commit if there is anything pending, and pls > start making test builds on various platforms, so > that we can issue essential build fixes if/where > required. I've just finished to sync svn with my local trees and I've rebuilt my apps

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi, > Andi Jahja-2 wrote: >> >> I'd like to propose that QTNetwork's thingies are reserved for next >> version >> (thus be removed from this version) because of the followings (sorry, >> this is my personal build): >> >> . >> TQHttpRequestHeader.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbo

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Andi Andi Jahja-2 wrote: > > I'd like to propose that QTNetwork's thingies are reserved for next > version > (thus be removed from this version) because of the followings (sorry, > this is my personal build): > > . > TQHttpRequestHeader.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Andi Jahja wrote: Hi, > It's OK now. No other similarity found. Probably new macros are needed > for compilers requiring extern "C" attributes for _static_functions_. Thank you very much for your tests. > To my knowledge, no Windoze C/C++ compilers needs such an attribute.

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Tamas TEVESZ
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Viktor Szakáts wrote: hi, > start making test builds on various platforms, so my batch looks fine (linux host to dos/watcom, os2/watcom, win/watcom, win/mingw, linux/watcom, linux/gcc, linux/sunpro, linux/gcc, both c and cpp; linux/sunpro/cpp is unknown (because of recen

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Andi Jahja
It's OK now. No other similarity found. Probably new macros are needed for compilers requiring extern "C" attributes for _static_functions_. To my knowledge, no Windoze C/C++ compilers needs such an attribute. Thanks. -- Andi On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:34:20 +0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > It's M

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, > There is one pending WinCE showstopper (posted > few days ago on the list: GetEnvironmentVariable) > which needs to be fixed yet. I added workaround for it to current code. Please test. BTW can you modify hbmk2 to not ignore -shared parameter i

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Andi Jahja wrote: Hi, > A non-compilation occurs on MSVC 6: > src\pp\pplib.c(76) : error C2375: 'hb_pp_ErrorMessage' : redefinition; > different linkage > src\pp\pplib.c(64) : see declaration of 'hb_pp_ErrorMessage' > src\pp\pplib.c(96) : error C2375: 'hb_pp_Disp' :

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Andi Jahja
Hi, I'd like to propose that QTNetwork's thingies are reserved for next version (thus be removed from this version) because of the followings (sorry, this is my personal build): . TQHttpRequestHeader.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _HB_FUN_QHTTPHEADER TQHttpResponseHeader.obj

Re: [Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Andi Jahja
Hi, A non-compilation occurs on MSVC 6: src\pp\pplib.c(76) : error C2375: 'hb_pp_ErrorMessage' : redefinition; different linkage src\pp\pplib.c(64) : see declaration of 'hb_pp_ErrorMessage' src\pp\pplib.c(96) : error C2375: 'hb_pp_Disp' : redefinition; different linkage src\pp\pp

[Harbour] Tagging 2.0.0: Tomorrow

2009-12-21 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi All, I'd like to tag 2.0.0 final tomorrow CET 12:00. Pls commit if there is anything pending, and pls start making test builds on various platforms, so that we can issue essential build fixes if/where required. There is one pending WinCE showstopper (posted few days ago on the list: GetEn