Re: [Harbour] speedtst results (owatcom)

2009-03-31 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > > Can you upload them to some public host? > > Sure: > > http://www.syenar.hu/harbour/owst.zip > > I've just tested them with WINE on AMD Phenom(tm) 8450 Triple-Core 2100MHZ. > Results below. Tomorrow I'll make tests with real Windows also with mixed version which > uses stack calling convent

Re: [Harbour] speedtst results (owatcom)

2009-03-31 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, > Can you upload them to some public host? > Sure: > http://www.syenar.hu/harbour/owst.zip I've just tested them with WINE on AMD Phenom(tm) 8450 Triple-Core 2100MHZ. Results below. Tomorrow I'll make tests with real Windows also with mixed version

Re: [Harbour] speedtst results (owatcom)

2009-03-31 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > > I don't want to draw any conclusions, -6r mode causes > > a slight overall slowdown in ST mode and a minor speedup > > in MT mode. Slowdown in ST mode can be accounted for > > T030 and T031, the rest of tests became faster. > > Thank you. > In my tests passing parameters by register: > [ to

Re: [Harbour] speedtst results (owatcom)

2009-03-31 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > Attached results. > Both with -gc3, one with r10748 (stack calls), and one > with r10756 + HB_USER_CFLAGS=-6r. ST and MT, > two runs with each combination. > [ The previously posted quick MT results seems wrong, now > with repeated and saved tests it's a

Re: [Harbour] speedtst results (owatcom)

2009-03-31 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > > After recent owatcom tweaks, its performance went back to a very good > level > > in ST mode. > > msvc ST: 29s MT: 49s > > mingw ST: 34s > > owatcom ST: 38s MT: 75s > > pocc ST: 44s > > bcc ST: 46s > > owatcom (yesterday) ST: 54s > > And this is without register calling, so if we manage to so

Re: [Harbour] speedtst results (owatcom)

2009-03-31 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, > After recent owatcom tweaks, its performance went back to a very good level > in ST mode. > msvc ST: 29s MT: 49s > mingw ST: 34s > owatcom ST: 38s MT: 75s > pocc ST: 44s > bcc ST: 46s > owatcom (yesterday) ST: 54s > And this is without register cal

[Harbour] speedtst results (owatcom)

2009-03-31 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi All, After recent owatcom tweaks, its performance went back to a very good level in ST mode. msvc ST: 29s MT: 49s mingw ST: 34s owatcom ST: 38s MT: 75s pocc ST: 44s bcc ST: 46s owatcom (yesterday) ST: 54s And this is without register calling, so if we manage to solve it, a little can be shaved

Re: [Harbour] Speedtst results

2008-10-04 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
-Messaggio Originale- Da: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List." Data invio: sabato 4 ottobre 2008 21.47 Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Speedtst results And if you can then please also take current SVN speedtst a

Re: [Harbour] Speedtst results

2008-10-04 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
-Messaggio Originale- Da: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List." Data invio: sabato 4 ottobre 2008 21.47 Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Speedtst results If possible please also try speedtst with some additional param

Re: [Harbour] Speedtst results

2008-10-04 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote: Hi Enrico, > CPU: Intel Core 2 CPU 6320 - 2 GB RAM > ST > 10/04/08 14:49:39 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 > Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev. 9542) Borland C++ 5.5.1 (32 bit) > [ total application time: ]40.75 > [ tot

[Harbour] Speedtst results

2008-10-04 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
CPU: Intel Core 2 CPU 6320 - 2 GB RAM ST Startup loop to increase CPU clock... 10/04/08 14:49:39 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev. 9542) Borland C++ 5.5.1 (32 bit) N_LOOPS =100 [ empty loop overhead ].0.08 ==