On Mon, 04 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> hbmk2 could easily be "fixed" simply by not adding
> these libs at all in neither static or dynamic builds.
> This will however make hbmk2 usage somewhat more
> complicated for users. For sure hbdebug is something
> I'd let hbmk2 to handle autom
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
> * harbour.spec
> + Merged lib and static subpackages into main one.
> hbmk2 requires that both dynamic and static libs (namely hbcplr)
> are present for successful linking.
> Please test and comment, I can re
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> * harbour.spec
> + Merged lib and static subpackages into main one.
oh, i see you did that while i was away typing.
anyway, there's no point in reverting that; currently (by virtue of
rpm/deb being used as a convenience contain
Revision: 13457
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13457&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-03 12:28:25 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 13:24 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* INSTALL
+ Added OS/2
