Hi Mindaugas,
Thanks for the explanation, I think it's now perfect after your commit.
[ I'll readd CDO and OO open tests, they are also working properly. ]
Brgds,
Viktor
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> For me array support is enough to cover passing ar
Hi,
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
Should we ignore backward
(descending) iteration flag and do forward iteration, should we do not
iterate at all (current behavior), or should we give runtime error (which
one?)?
Thank you very much.
Probably RTE will be better - easier to detect potential probl
Hi,
For me array support is enough to cover passing arrays to
OLE calls and maybe getting back arrays from OLE calls.
I've implemented some limited support for arrays. It's enough for the
simplest OpenOffice oDesktop:loadComponentFromURL() calls. Though, I do
not have more tests for multidi
Hi Mindaugas,
For me array support is enough to cover passing arrays to
OLE calls and maybe getting back arrays from OLE calls.
Full support in hbwin (xhb) is quite strange, f.e. there is such
code in testole.prg:
[ #xtranslate :( ) := => :( ):Value := ]
#1 oAS:Cells( 3, 1 ) := "Explict D
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
Hi,
>> 2009-04-24 23:15 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt)
>> * harbour/contrib/hbole/olecore.c
>> * harbour/contrib/hbole/oleauto.prg
>> + implemented FOR EACH enumeration. The code was proposed by
>> Przemysl
2009-04-24 23:15 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt)
* harbour/contrib/hbole/olecore.c
* harbour/contrib/hbole/oleauto.prg
+ implemented FOR EACH enumeration. The code was proposed by
Przemyslaw on mailing list. Some fixes applied.
Hi,
I've put some hands on
Revision: 10930
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10930&view=rev
Author: snaiperis
Date: 2009-04-24 20:15:07 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-04-24 23:15 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt)
* harbour/contrib