Hi Pritpal,
> >1) You're introducing xhb dependency for gtwvg, which isn't good.
>
> As stated in previous post, I have deffered this decision.
> So until we reach an agreement WAPI_*() functions category
> will contain only those functions not needing structures.
That's fine good, but now you
Hello
<<<
Thanks, I think you should look at it, the other thing is GC
collected pointers which is essential for a lot of tasks here.
I'd suggest to try it, it's not that bad believe me.
>>>
I tried it after posting above message. But I get only
pointers at PRG level which I cannot exploit the
Hi Pritpal,
> I tried but am unable to use it in a generic way. May be
> I am not familiar with this concept since begining.
> Francesco was trying to make it generic, so I am waiting
> till he comes up with this solution. I, at my level best, can do
> with which I am familiar.
Thanks, I think
Viktor
<<<
You can tweak this in gtwvg/Makefile + gtwvg/make_*.bat,
please see the solution for this same task in hbwhat's
similar files.
>>>
Ok. I will look into.
<<<
As for C structs, Przemek recommended a way of doing it
the clean way, maybe you should consider it, instead of the
xhb solutio
Hi Pritpal,
You can tweak this in gtwvg/Makefile + gtwvg/make_*.bat,
please see the solution for this same task in hbwhat's
similar files.
As for C structs, Przemek recommended a way of doing it
the clean way, maybe you should consider it, instead of the
xhb solution, which is a terrible and unsaf
Revision: 10342
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10342&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-02-19 01:07:54 + (Thu, 19 Feb 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-02-18 17:05 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* harbour/contrib/gtwvg/wvgsc
