[Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14611] trunk/harbour

2010-05-27 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Xavi-2 wrote: > > > Maybe in a public forum can expect a change, but when there are comercial > interests... I don't know. :( > http://groups.google.com/group/scintilla-interest/browse_thread/thread/557fb713f11f09be > Thanks Xavi. I have just subscibed to the forum and am awaiting confirmati

Re: [Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14611] trunk/harbour

2010-05-27 Thread Xavi
Hi Pritpal, 1. Flagship lexer is not implemented in QScintilla which I did. 2. May be it can go, but a lot of warnings while compiling QScintilla as per Harbour make system. 3. I could only build static lib, .a, and do not know how to a shared one, .dll. 4. One serious issue which I could no

Re: [Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14611] trunk/harbour

2010-05-27 Thread Viktor Szakáts
>>> + contrib/hbqt/hbqt.h >>> + Added: constants hbqt_par_Qsci* >>> ; TODO make them local. >> >> This is serious modularization fault, >> even for an initial upload. Pls fix it. >> > > Yes, sure. > I need a name of such .h - hbqt_local.h ? contrib/hbqt/qscintilla/hbqscintilla.h which

[Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[14611] trunk/harbour

2010-05-26 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > >> + contrib/hbqt/hbqt.h >>+ Added: constants hbqt_par_Qsci* >> ; TODO make them local. > > This is serious modularization fault, > even for an initial upload. Pls fix it. > Yes, sure. I need a name of such .h - hbqt_local.h ? >>+ Initial upload of w