Re: [Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12634] trunk/harbour

2009-10-05 Thread Viktor Szakáts
How can I test them ? Yes, I've added it even, just forgot about it. Anyhow was it ever tested? I don't think so, so it should be. How can I test them ? hbmk2 -shared ... In general hbmk2 with whatever parametrization on OS/2. I don't know you can look at INSTALL examples, or any .hbp/.hbm

[Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12634] trunk/harbour

2009-10-05 Thread David Arturo Macias Corona
Viktor: How can I test them ? Yes, I've added it even, just forgot about it. Anyhow was it ever tested? I don't think so, so it should be. How can I test them ? It's one thing .dlls are generated, and another that they actually work. hbmk2 -shared os2/watcom, os2/gcc support is also untes

Re: [Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12634] trunk/harbour

2009-10-04 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Build results include .dlls: 24/09/09 5:48a 3,231,453 0 a--- harbour.dll 24/09/09 5:48a 3,263,217 0 a--- harbourm.dll How can I test them ? -- Now you wrote: "BTW, os2/watcom .dll support is also missing yet." So I am not sure what you are referr

[Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12634] trunk/harbour

2009-10-04 Thread David Arturo Macias Corona
Viktor: --- GCC 4.x C:\usr\bin\gccenv.cmd set HB_COMPILER=gccomf os2-make [...] >> Updated info: your revision 12639 fixes partially >> c:\usr\local433\gccenv.cmd does not exist. User must refer to >>included >> examples to set environment or to use an modified

Re: [Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12634] trunk/harbour

2009-10-03 Thread Viktor Szakáts
It's not a different compiler but the same in a different mode altogether, and/or different version. Yes, and it's a big difference, since you added a new "dimension" to the existing set of settings, while I've only extended existing dimensions with a new value. Do not fool ourselves HB_COMPI

[Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12634] trunk/harbour

2009-10-03 Thread David Arturo Macias Corona
Viktor: It's not a different compiler but the same in a different mode altogether, and/or different version. Yes, and it's a big difference, since you added a new "dimension" to the existing set of settings, while I've only extended existing dimensions with a new value. Do not fool ourselve

Re: [Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12634] trunk/harbour

2009-10-02 Thread Viktor Szakáts
As I said I do not like HB_COMPILER=gccomf because is not a different compiler, just a feature of same compiler, but since you presented as gcc3/4 I saw is a consequence of HB_COMPILER requirements. You just follow requirements of your own implementation Considered as an different compiler, w

[Harbour] Re: SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12634] trunk/harbour

2009-10-02 Thread David Arturo Macias Corona
Viktor: >2009-10-01 17:58 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) > * INSTALL > * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg > * config/os2/gcc.mk > + config/os2/gccomf.mk >+ Added OS/2 GCC OMF support. > This tries to fix resource support in hbmk2 compared to David's > solution. hbmk2 suppor