On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> Probably you generated non unique file names for them.
> You will have to change your code.
Thanks, I've changed it and know it seems to work better.
best regards,
Lorenzo
___
Harbour mailin
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Did you try hb_FTempCreate()?
> hb_FTempCreate( cDir, cPrefix, FC_NORMAL, @cFileName ) ) -> fhnd
Thanks, I'll try it.
best regards,
Lorenzo
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
Hi Lorenzo,
Did you try hb_FTempCreate()?
hb_FTempCreate( cDir, cPrefix, FC_NORMAL, @cFileName ) ) -> fhnd
Brgds,
Viktor
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak
> wrote:
>
> > Harbour recognize that the same file is reope
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
> I'm getting some errors with temporary files used to sort or index (
> though in a stress test ).
Probably you generated non unique file names for them.
You will have to change your code.
> What's the best way to get a unique temporay file in the same
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> Harbour recognize that the same file is reopen using it's inode not
> name so even if you create hard or soft links to given file then
> it will be detected that the same file is open and existing open handle
> reused in new workarea.
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
Hi,
> I've tried a small test and it works as expected so it must be sth more
> complex.
> When I open the dbfs I also create some temporary dbfs.
> I use a simple if file() to check if there is already a temp file with
> that name and if yes I change
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Lorenzo Fiorini
wrote:
> I could protect the dbfopen with a mutex. Is it safe to create a
> static hash that holds the mutexes in the main thread and access it
> using a function?
Sorry if I continue to reply to myself but with a mutex like:
in the main thread
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Lorenzo Fiorini
wrote:
> Now the menus are ok but I have problems with the dbfs.
> ...
> I've searched in the mailing list and in the ChangeLog and what I
> found seems to state that workareas are local to threads.
I've tried a small test and it works as expected
