Re: [Harbour] Re: Changes to hb* scripts

2008-05-05 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We already have it. It's hbcc. Use it instead of gcc. Yes, I've just found that it can be used in that way also. best regards, Lorenzo ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@har

Re: [Harbour] Re: Changes to hb* scripts

2008-05-05 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Fri, 02 May 2008, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote: > > Trying to move my build system to hb* scripts I've done some changes > I think that a C compiler wrapper to compile C sources that use > Harbour API could be useful. > Without it Harbour include dir and $C_USR have to be "exposed" in the > makefiles.

[Harbour] Re: Changes to hb* scripts

2008-05-01 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Lorenzo Fiorini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying to move my build system to hb* scripts I've done some changes I think that a C compiler wrapper to compile C sources that use Harbour API could be useful. Without it Harbour include dir and $C_USR have to be "exp