On Thu, 14 May 2009, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
Hi,
> The bug is not recently introduced.
> It has been existing for years because was hidden by someone who disabled
> checking for AE_SUCCESS value returned by AdsGet*() functions and hardcoded
> the size of returned value to maximum size of declar
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Luis Krause Mantilla wrote:
Hi,
> The Harbour list claims there's a bug recently introduced
> to rddads. Char fields larger than 23 display one extra
> char at the end. I can't try the latest xharbour from cvs
> but with ads1.c v. 1.140 there aren't any problems.
The bug
