Re: [Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-17 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Changing to fnc* didn't make a difference, seems that the TEST command isn't PPes: --- #line 1 "STD.CH"@"STD.CH" #line 1 "Set.ch"@"Set.ch" #line 1 "natmsg.ch"@"natmsg.ch" #line 18 "Set.ch" #line 37 "STD.CH" #line 1 "Get.ch"@"Get.ch" #line 42 "STD.CH" #line 1 "Prompt.ch"@"Prompt.ch" #line 47 "STD.C

Re: [Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-17 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Hello Pritpal You can find info about qt with harbour at http://www.magsoftinfo.com.br/blog/?cat=9 2009/3/17 Pritpal Bedi > > Hello > > > Angel Pais wrote: > Seems interesting. Can someone points me to the > directions how I can setup QT on my XP machine and what should I > look into, just to sa

Re: Re: [Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-17 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Pritpal, > > The question is which way to choose to rewrite it _once_. > > Options: GUI and WUI (web UI). For me a GUI is only an > > option if it's at least portable, and it's a plus if it's relatively > > easy to migrate CUI source, possibly with gradual rewrite. > > > > This is EXACTLY the

Re: [Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-16 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Angel Pais wrote: > > I've tried them, but test sample painted slow and did nothing. > Not tried latest improvements though. > Anyway if I'd wanted to stick whit a windows-only GUI I'd stick with > Xbase++. > What I need is a multiplatform write once-deploy anywhere GUI framework. > Do

Re: Re: [Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-16 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > The question is which way to choose to rewrite it _once_. > Options: GUI and WUI (web UI). For me a GUI is only an > option if it's at least portable, and it's a plus if it's relatively > easy to migrate CUI source, possibly with gradual rewrite. > This is EXAC

Re: [Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-16 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, > --- > Xbase++ (R) Compiler 1.90.331 Apr 27 2006 > Copyright (c) Alaska Software. All rights reserved. > File: speedtst.prg Line: 816 > speedtst.prg(182:0): error XBT0200: Syntax Error > speedtst.prg(265:0): warning XBT0105: Function t030 does not

Re: [Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Oh and BTW, message to Alaska folks, maybe someone is reading this: I have to be an Administrator (in XP) in order to make a compile session, otherwise I'm getting an "Error / Error in saving message!" messagebox. AFAIR this is so since at least 5 years (since I'm non admin on my PC). I think this

Re: [Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Przemek, --- Xbase++ (R) Compiler 1.90.331 Apr 27 2006 Copyright (c) Alaska Software. All rights reserved. File: speedtst.prg Line: 816 speedtst.prg(182:0): error XBT0200: Syntax Error speedtst.prg(265:0): warning XBT0105: Function t030 does not end with RETURN speedtst.prg(306:0): error XBT022

[Harbour] Question to xBase++ users

2009-03-16 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
Hi All, I would like to ask someone who uses xBase++ and Harbour to make some tests with tests/speedtst.prg. Current tests/speedtst.prg code can be compiled and executed by Clipper so I hope it should also work with xBase++ as least in single thread mode which I set as default when __XPP__ macro