Re: [Harbour] Problem with Get

2008-06-21 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Sylvain, After making your sample work, I've tested this with CA-Cl*pper 5.2e, and it doesn't update the second GET either. In Clipper :varPut() will never modify :changed, in fact :varPut() will do nothing else than updating the variable with the current GET value. To me it seems that Har

Re: [Harbour] Problem with Get

2008-06-21 Thread Sylvain Larche
Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Sylvian, After making your sample work, I've tested this with CA-Cl*pper 5.2e, and it doesn't update the second GET either. In Clipper :varPut() will never modify :changed, in fact :varPut() will do nothing else than updating the variable with the current GET value. To

Re: [Harbour] Problem with Get

2008-06-21 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Sylvian, After making your sample work, I've tested this with CA-Cl*pper 5.2e, and it doesn't update the second GET either. In Clipper :varPut() will never modify :changed, in fact :varPut() will do nothing else than updating the variable with the current GET value. To me it seems that Harbou

[Harbour] Problem with Get

2008-06-21 Thread Sylvain Larche
I was testing new update to my software and notice the following Here is a simplified piece of my code this is not a working code but should demonstrated the code of the problem. FUNCTION EditItem() LOCAL GetList AS ARRAY := {} LOCAL lnDept AS NUMERIC := 0 LOCAL lnTax AS NUMERIC := 0