Hi all

 I note that there has been a fair bit of discussion about what an ORM is.
 That's all well and good but at the end of the day what counts is what
people want / need regardless of what it is called.  And then is it
feasible to implement and is there sufficient demand to make it worth the
effort to develop it.

 Those of us who use OO techniques in our xBase code would I think mostly
appreciate a way of persisting our objects without abandoning the object
concept.

 We will probably end up deriving our single item type classes from a base
class that might, for example, be called TPersistableObject, which might
include methods such as Read(), Write(), GetOID() etc

 I am assuming that the back end will utilise client server architecture /
IP sockets.

 Regards

 Doug
 
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to