Re: [Harbour] For Przemek: SIXCDX difference found with examples

2010-02-28 Thread smu johnson
Przemek, As always... many thanks, 'O Six driver database guru. I will keep an eye out for a druzus commit. Keep up the great work! 2010/2/28 Przemysław Czerpak > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, smu johnson wrote: > > Hi, > > > With a Roll-your-own index open, when you use a dbgoto(), the record > point

Re: [Harbour] For Przemek: SIXCDX difference found with examples

2010-02-28 Thread Przemysław Czerpak
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, smu johnson wrote: Hi, > With a Roll-your-own index open, when you use a dbgoto(), the record pointer > is moved to the correct row in the table but the pointer in the index file > is not positioned to the corresponding row, even though the record is in the > index. With a r

Re: [Harbour] For Przemek: SIXCDX difference found with examples

2010-02-26 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Hi, smu johnson wrote: With a Roll-your-own index open, when you use a dbgoto(), the record pointer is moved to the correct row in the table but the pointer in the index file is not positioned to the corresponding row, even though the record is in the index. With a regular cdx index, the ind

[Harbour] For Przemek: SIXCDX difference found with examples

2010-02-26 Thread smu johnson
Hi again, With a Roll-your-own index open, when you use a dbgoto(), the record pointer is moved to the correct row in the table but the pointer in the index file is not positioned to the corresponding row, even though the record is in the index. With a regular cdx index, the index pointer is alwa