Re: [Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-16 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Pritpal Bedi wrote: Hi Pritpal, > If you are touching RDD code, may I request to provide > one more slot of type PHB_ITEM, say Cargo for open|close| > create|copy methods. I had posted this request almost > an year before and you agreed to implement it if you remember. We'v

Re: [Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-16 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Przemek Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote: > > It should work. The problem is probably caused by some typo I do not > see now. I'll make this modification myself using the patch you sent > and I'll commit it. > If you are touching RDD code, may I request to provide one more slot of type PHB_IT

Re: [Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-16 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, > Couldn't debunk how DBFAREAP and AREAP are related to > each other, and it seems I'm accessing one of them on the caller > side and the other on the dbf1.c side, or maybe something else. > I've add these: > --- wafunc.c / hb_rddCreateTableTemp() >

Re: [Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Przemek, > Yes, so we don't lose anything here then. Anyhow I'm trying to > avoid the DBOPENINFO modification (plus your suggested fixes). > Will redo the tests and if okay, commit. > Didn't manage yet. Couldn't debunk how DBFAREAP and AREAP are related to each other, and it seems I'm access

Re: [Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Przemek, > > One part which might be much for me is the memo handling, > > I'd appreciate your help in this area. > > OK, I'll look at it but we should not have any bigger problems here. > Just simply memo file should also be temporary and maybe we should > block some operations like memo pack

Re: [Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-16 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > One part which might be much for me is the memo handling, > I'd appreciate your help in this area. OK, I'll look at it but we should not have any bigger problems here. Just simply memo file should also be temporary and maybe we should block

Re: [Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-16 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Przemek, Many thanks for your answer, I've just noticed your mail today, sorry. I'm processing it, trying to make modifications and will get back to you. I agree with grouping RDD modifications, 1.1 seems like a good opportunity to make some changes. MT support may require it anyway, if for not

Re: [Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-16 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > Pls find enclosed patch which implements: > dbCreateTemp( , , , , , > ) -> > This creates and opens a new temporary table. The file automatically > gets deleted on close, all indexes created are also handled as temporary. > Please review a

[Harbour] DBCREATETEMP() patch

2009-02-15 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi all, Pls find enclosed patch which implements: dbCreateTemp( , , , , , ) -> This creates and opens a new temporary table. The file automatically gets deleted on close, all indexes created are also handled as temporary. Please review and comment. Brgds, Viktor --- Index: include/hbrdddbf.h