On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> In Class(y) code class function should return "class object" not object
> of given class. This class object understands :NEW() message and create
> object of given class sending to this object :INIT() message with
> parameters passed to
Hi Przemyslaw
I downloaded Class(y) and read the docs. Thank you for your (as usual)
detailed reply, I am now considerably more educated. Class(y) seemed
to be really on the cutting edge back then, the folks at CA really
blew Clipper out of the water.
FWIW I would be in favour of the breakin
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi Alex,
> I was calling a method called "end" on a COM object, and nothing was
> happening. Fortunately for me the COM object supplies an equivalent
> alternative - endTransaction(), and that worked.
> Is end() somehow reserved in our classes?
AFAIK
Hi
I was calling a method called "end" on a COM object, and nothing was
happening. Fortunately for me the COM object supplies an equivalent
alternative - endTransaction(), and that worked.
Is end() somehow reserved in our classes?
In a similar vein, what is the difference between init() and
