Re: Re: [Harbour] Bug with ADS and DOUBLE fields

2008-03-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:13:05 +0100, you wrote: >On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi ppl, >> With ADS, if the double field have large values like 1234567890123, >> harbour displays instead a value. >> If I use str(field,20) the value is displayed correct. > >Not only double

Re: [Harbour] Bug with ADS and DOUBLE fields

2008-02-29 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi ppl, > With ADS, if the double field have large values like 1234567890123, > harbour displays instead a value. > If I use str(field,20) the value is displayed correct. Not only double. In ADS* RDDs non of numeric binary field sizes is tra

[Harbour] Bug with ADS and DOUBLE fields

2008-02-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ppl, With ADS, if the double field have large values like 1234567890123, harbour displays instead a value. If I use str(field,20) the value is displayed correct. A sample is in: http://www.fwi.com.br/toninho/adsdouble.zip Thanks and best regards, Toninho. __