Developer List.
Subject: RE: [Harbour] A standard for the Harbour's SQL libs
Hi Mindaugas,
can you add to svn?
Anybody have different proposal?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mindaugas
Kavaliauskas
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 1:00
for the Harbour's SQL libs
Hi,
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> Before you will started the work then I suggest you to look at CLIP
> project - you will find in SF.
I've looked to CLIP code. The basic idea (Clip's SQL interface gives
possibility to access SQL databases, but
Nice job.
Brgds,
Viktor
void hb_socketInit( void );
void hb_socketCleanup( void );
PHB_ITEM hb_socketNew( int iTimeOut );
int hb_socketClose( PHB_ITEM pSocket );
FHANDLE hb_socketHandle( PHB_ITEM pSocket );
int hb_socketStatus( PHB_ITEM pSocket );
int hb_socketErrorCode
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi Alex,
> Sockets appear to me to be reliable in Harbour but I think Przemek has
> alluded to problems with them? I don't know what they are. I know ADS uses
> UDP, I'm not sure why.
Now the biggest problem is lack of C level API and some missing
fu
To all
Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
Today we have hbodbc, hbmysql, hbpgsql, hbfbird contrib libs and
probably more in the future.
Their pourpose is to connect Harbour to SQL databases but they use
different ( class ) interfaces.
I would venture that many Harbour programmers use these SQL databases
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:04 AM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] A standard for the Harbour's SQL libs
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Very nice peace of code which is also very good start point fo
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very nice peace of code which is also very good start point for
> multi RDBMS RDD API. I'll look closer into it in spare time.
> Lorenzo asked about common OOP interface for different RDBMS
> and this is rather start
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
Hi Mindaugas,
> The message is resent because my last message (without attachment) has
> already reached mailing list.
> Instead of attaching .zip file, you'll find it at:
> http://www.dbtopas.lt/hrb/sdd.zip
Very nice peace of code which is als
>Hi Lorenzo,
>Very good idea.
>My vote for HDBC as a name.
+1...
Regards,
Toninho.
__
Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
___
Harbour ma
The message is resent because my last message (without attachment) has
already reached mailing list.
Instead of attaching .zip file, you'll find it at:
http://www.dbtopas.lt/hrb/sdd.zip
==
Hi,
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
Before you will started the work the
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
Hi Mindaugas,
>
> I've also had a problem like this. I've implemented some universal
> interface to access SQL databases. It's done via RDD, but class interface
> can be implemented also. I have implemented SQLBASE, SQLMIX (see below)
> RDDs a
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Vailton Renato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to understand a single question: this would be something to
> develop a OOP class or would be like an RDD native with support for SQL?
It's hard to answer at the moment.
My first goal was to unify the class
Hi all!
I would like to understand a single question: this would be something to
develop a OOP class or would be like an RDD native with support for SQL?
2008/10/12 Lorenzo Fiorini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Lorenzo Fiorini
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems that
/showfiles.php?group_id=170673
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lorenzo
Fiorini
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 9:03 AM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] A standard for the Harbour's SQL libs
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008
Very Thanks for your effort
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Przemyslaw
Czerpak
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:01 AM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: RE: [Harbour] A standard for the Harbour's SQL libs
On Su
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Lorenzo Fiorini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that HDBC has been decided. Ok step 1 done :)
Resources for all the interested:
JDBC tutorial
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jdbc/basics/index.html
CLIP SQL interface
http://www.itk.ru/clip-doc.en/sql.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before you will started the work then I suggest you to look at
> CLIP project - you will find in SF.
> Few years ago Rust implemented such common class interface for
> different RDBMS in CLIP so it may give you some
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've also had a problem like this. I've implemented some universal interface
> to access SQL databases. It's done via RDD, but class interface can be
> implemented also. I have implemented SQLBASE, SQLMIX (see be
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
Hi Massimo,
> When you planed release Multi Windows interface for thread with own console
> window?
When I'll finish the base of MT mode and find a free day for it.
Now I have to find the reason of problem with Vista MT builds.
Then I will have to re
: [Harbour] A standard for the Harbour's SQL libs
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
> The idea is to have something like JDBC where every app that use jdbc
> can use different DBS without changing the code: it could be called
> Harbour Data Objects interface HDO o
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
> The idea is to have something like JDBC where every app that use jdbc
> can use different DBS without changing the code: it could be called
> Harbour Data Objects interface HDO or HDBC Harbour DataBase Connector.
Very good idea. If possib
sql_field )
DBSKIP()
Mydbclass.Movenext
ENDDO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mindaugas
Kavaliauskas
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 10:18 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] A standard for the Harb
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Fiorini
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 10:05 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] A standard for the Harbour's SQL libs
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Pritpal Bedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
Today we have hbodbc, hbmysql, hbpgsql, hbfbird contrib libs and
probably more in the future.
Their pourpose is to connect Harbour to SQL databases but they use
different ( class ) interfaces.
Hi,
I've also had a problem like this. I've implemented some universal
inte
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Pritpal Bedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
>
> Szakáts Viktor wrote:
>>
>> IMO you're not wrong at all, I'd personally start
>> with the class interface, and see the rest later.
>>
>
> I will be particpating as well.
Good news.
So many people in front of
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Francesco Saverio Giudice
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm also interested and I found HDBC a good name.
Great!
Ciao,
Lorenzo
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman
Hi All
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
>
> IMO you're not wrong at all, I'd personally start
> with the class interface, and see the rest later.
>
I will be particpating as well.
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/A-standard-for-the-Harbour%27s-SQL-libs-tp19
Hi Lorenzo,
Sounds perfect to me.
Changing some names of the methods and the datas is easy the main
problem is to define the "platform".
Drivers are made by a C interface and by a prg class:
Will the "drivers" be dyinamically loaded?
I'd imagine on the first round, we should have
a commo
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds perfect to me.
Changing some names of the methods and the datas is easy the main
problem is to define the "platform".
Drivers are made by a C interface and by a prg class:
Will the "drivers" be dyinamically load
Lorenzo,
I'm also interested and I found HDBC a good name.
Best regards
Francesco
Lorenzo Fiorini ha scritto:
The idea is to have something like JDBC where every app that use jdbc
can use different DBS without changing the code: it could be called
Harbour Data Objects interface HDO or HDBC H
We also have hbodbc, which _may_ be a base for a common
interface, or it could also be synced to the std one.
I'm saying may, because I'm not at all familiar with
ODBC, so it's difficult to judge how badly it is Microsoft
orientated or something stuck in the past. But it's
worth checking.
Actual
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We also have hbodbc, which _may_ be a base for a common
> interface, or it could also be synced to the std one.
> I'm saying may, because I'm not at all familiar with
> ODBC, so it's difficult to judge how badly it is Mic
Hi Lorenzo,
do you use any SQL backend?
do you know JDBC?
Not yet, and also no experience yet with JDBC. I'm still in
the process of cleaning any DOS ties, and converting my app
to native multiplatform Harbour.
what about the backward compatibility?
Backward compatibility may handled by s
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Massimo Belgrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also agree
> This idea uniform the access to Harbour Database by class
Would you like to participate?
Do you actually use any SQL DBS with Harbour?
Do you know JDBC?
Are there Harbour/ODBC users here?
I use Post
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My vote for HDBC as a name.
Yes, it's probably the best one.
Just to move:
do you use any SQL backend?
do you know JDBC?
what about the backward compatibility?
The ideal would be to have a prg for every contrib/lib
: Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:58 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] A standard for the Harbour's SQL libs
Hi Lorenzo,
Very good idea.
My vote for HDBC as a name.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.10.11., at 18:51, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
> Today we have hbodbc, hbmysql,
Hi Lorenzo,
Very good idea.
My vote for HDBC as a name.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.10.11., at 18:51, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
Today we have hbodbc, hbmysql, hbpgsql, hbfbird contrib libs and
probably more in the future.
Their pourpose is to connect Harbour to SQL databases but they use
different (
Today we have hbodbc, hbmysql, hbpgsql, hbfbird contrib libs and
probably more in the future.
Their pourpose is to connect Harbour to SQL databases but they use
different ( class ) interfaces.
Thus if an Harbour app is made for mysql, has to heavily changed for
odbc or postgresql.
I wonder if the
38 matches
Mail list logo
