all the best,
frank
- Original Message -
From: Viktor Szakáts
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Speedtest results
Hi Frank,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:44 PM, frank van nuffel
wrote:
To be
Hi Viktor,
To be concluded from your ranks is that POCC is indeed more intersting than
BCC; is POCC the same as Pelles ISO C Compiler 2.70
On their website there's only a download for version 5.00.1 - am i missing sth?
best regards,
frank
- Original Message -
From: Viktor Szaká
Hi Enrico,
I cannot confirm; installing works alright (latest SVN; though there was a
little msg onscreen; see below)
If you're using an install path other than the svnroot, try whether
\lib is empty before building; it might be that dependencies don't
trigger because of the availability of
Wouldn't it be the right time to introduce the concept of (real) namespaces,
if dev allows a timeframe for it?
frank
- Original Message -
From: "Lorenzo Fiorini"
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:27 PM
Subject: [Harbour] Are there hbodbc and/o
Well said; thank you all very much!
frank
- Original Message -
From: "Pritpal Bedi"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:31 AM
Subject: [Harbour] A Note of Appreciation - Welldone Viktor !
Hello Everybody
New "make" system has turned out to be
sheer joy for developers and a m
Hi Viktor,
Just a thought; in 3) you say that it deletes files from step 1, but aren't the
files from step 2) also deleted (when the install happened from inside the svn
root); also, an uninstall option which undo what step 2 actually does would be
interesting, without touching what step 3 del
Thank you Viktor; the default works fine ( also contrib is build automatically
now :-)))
best regards,
frank
- Original Message -
From: Viktor Szakáts
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Problems
Sorr
tated
- Original Message -
From: "frank van nuffel"
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Problems
Dear Enrico and Viktor,
The GNU package referenced in a previous mail contains a make utility
called ming
Dear Enrico and Viktor,
The GNU package referenced in a previous mail contains a make utility called
mingw32-make.exe and not just make.exe
I copied mingw32-make.exe to make.exe in the bin folder where this original
mingw32-make executable resides; then having that dir come before anything
els
Hello Enrico,
It's just a guess (since i cannot test currently), but perhaps using a scope
resolution message can help here
> RETURN ::GET:SetPos( nPos )
Just a thought, not tested
Kind regards,
frank
.oO enjoyed to see .prg level related code snippets again in this forum ;-)
- O
Hello Viktor,
Since some time i'm switched to using a simple scheme; a letter to indicate the
base type (for templates), and additionally a number expressing the precision
(for concrete types)
cchar (as genuine char)
c0 normal char
c1 unicode char
uunsigned int
u0 8 bit
Hi Pritpal,
- Original Message -
From: "Pritpal Bedi"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] May be it is useful for you
WVG or WVT both gives power to render console outpur commands
to a TRUE Windows' window.
Do you happen to know whether this also work
Hi Pritpal,
Could it be /u you're looking for? Else, but i'm not sure whether
this is operational in Harbour, there has been mention of /u+ (or
was it in xHarbour; can't look it up right now) - without it you might need
to manually #include "std.ch" from your custom file
kindly,
frank
--
Hello Pritpal,
Many thanks for the example, which is worth more than a thousand words (to
get a glimpse of what wvg is about); would it be correct to conclude wvg
allows for kind-of-console programming (without the complexity of windows
programming (except perhaps event driven structure)) rend
Hi again,
- Original Message -
From: "Petr Chornyj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Harbour] Inconsistency in DATA Types
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW I can change empty codeblock datas from nil to {||nil} and eval it
always, instea
Hi Toninho, and all
to elaborate on this, it might be a good idea to introduce syntax for
nullable (nilable) types, just like in C#
it would suffice to assert a declaration with type info, followed by a
question mark
DATA bDraw AS CODEBLOCK? INIT nil
Then this var can be set to a CODEBLOCK or
Hi all, here are some extra results
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 7:35 PM
Subject: [Harbour] 2008-09-26 19:34 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw
Czerpak(druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
2008-09-26 19:34 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (
Hi Enrico,
you can download from here
http://cc.codegear.com/Free.aspx?id=24724
on the right, on top it says it is a free download, but you'll have to
register, upon which an email will be sent with a valid license for +-32000
days - no kidding ;-)
you'll have to gather the required files f
Hi Viktor,
Perhaps it's a legacy feature from the '87 compiler where = could also
signify assignment, but then again i doesn't explain the same for ==
iirc, Stephen Straley somewhere documented that for disambiguating = as
comparison, instead of assignment, it is best to write the constant to be
chnically compelling, and logically (meaning
logistically here) appealing).
So, arrived full-circle, i have come to look at things, not taking them for
granted, hence why i bothered.
kind regards,
frank
- Original Message -
From: "Szakáts Viktor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Viktor,
Just a sidenote:
- Original Message -
From: "Szakáts Viktor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:12 PM
Subject: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-14 12:06 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats
(harbour.01 syenar hu)
2008-05-14 12:06 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.0
Hi Przemek,
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
> #undef _EXPAND_
>to:
> #include "undef.ch"
>Suc
Hi Przemek,
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
--- system definitions -
#xTRAN
Hi again, Przemek
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
In current PP <*id*> should work like in Clippe
Przemek,
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
In current PP <*id*> should work like in Clipper alloc
Hi Przemek,
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
On Tue, 06 May 20
Thanks Victor, now i know what to look for
Don't hesitate reverting as Przemek suggested, if that's what is better
From here on i'll manage
kind regards
frank
- Original Message -
From: "Szakáts Viktor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 12:26 PM
Subject: [Harbou
Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 2:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
On Mon, 05 May 2008, frank van nuffel wrote
PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
On Mon, 05 May 2008, frank van nuffel wrote:
Hi Frank,
I'm sorry for the cheering - my test setup appeared to be wron
ssage -
From: "frank van nuffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 2:04 PM
Subject: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
Hi,
attached are two versions of the .ppo output of one file c_y0cy_0.prg
c_y0cy_0[cl].ppo is c_y0cy_0.ppo preprocessed with clippe
k
- Original Message -
From: "frank van nuffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 2:04 PM
Subject: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives
Hi,
attached are two versions of the .ppo output of one file c_y0cy_0.prg
c_y0cy_0[cl].ppo is c_y0cy_0.
May the power be with you in all you undertake ;-)
wish you good health and happy architecting
and a very pleasant 2008 experience to all
frank
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak"
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 7:07 PM
Happy new year !!!
[snip]
best regards,
Pr
Sent to your private mailaddress; an executable with accompanying sources,
which are the output of the transpilation process with build flags set to
produce OO calls for native types, check argument types to
functions/messages and automatically optimize message calling with
_cyPshSelf where app
sorry, correction, my mistake
- Original Message -
From: "frank van nuffel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] CaseStudy: an alternative to Hungarian notation for
s from you, developers, for a parallel native type OO interface in
[x]Harbour, if this premise is acceptable (and at least one more to come),
you won't have to wait that long.
Anyhow, most of (o)ceans' implied syntax may be left behind for an Harbour
parallel, so that the resulting contr
Hello again,
Yes indeed, i remember very well how we got in touch; was it so long ago!
Although (o)ceans' got off the ground starting october 2003 you got it
correct wondering back then what exactly i was after, some sort of
concept, framework. (o)ceans' has been preceded by another project,
mo
g the new names,
or even execute without this translation thru the MESSAGE oldName IS newName
stay tuned as for an example in this forum, or check your private email
(whichever i'll opt for first)
best regards,
frank van nuffel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Pritpal Bedi" Sent: Frid
13, 2007 10:18 PM
Subject: RE: [Harbour] TO Przemek: trying to contact @priv...pl
When/Where you start this thread?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of frank van
nuffel
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:04 PM
To: Harbour Project Main D
ng to complete identifiers by entering type/scope notation
manually. Moreover, once the identifier sits, the postfix really invites to
selecting the proper scope operation, part of the (o)ceans' send syntax. I
might advocate other advantages, but in the end,
Hello again Przemek,
i'll start a new thread to check with the other
developers whether some premises to OO
for native data types inherent to the approach
used in my (o)ceans' thinktank project are
feasible, and desirable.
Without consent for these, i'm afraid (o)ceans'
can't contribute much
Hi all,
I'm new to this list, but have been harbour fan
since 2003 and also xHarbour shares my interest
Great job that's going on in here, much inspiring
And for Przemek, if you're reading this, i've been
replying to your mail to me dd 2007-10-04, twice
now. Have you received it?
Thanks
f
41 matches
Mail list logo
