Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
>> You request workareas from the zero workspace by alias which IMO is a
>> weakness in the design. Rather than having alias naming collisions, the
>> zero workspace FIFO's the workareas such that duplicate aliases are
>> retrieved in the order they were submitted.
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
> Below I'm attaching small code which can be used for basic tests.
> If possible I would like to ask you or other xbase++ user to run
> it and send results here.
>
Here is the output from Xbase++ v1.90.331:
_TST1: recno() -> 2 recno() -> 3 locks: 2 5 6 8
_TST2
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
> But what happens with parent relations to moved WA and how oare child
> visible in ZeroZone. Can I REQUEST each of them separately or only the
> WA which was explicitly released? If the first the what happens with
> relation their parent relation? Is it cleared? A
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
> Nice to see your messages again.
>
I am always lurking out here. Nice to see you are still aggressively
involved in Harbour. I assume you are still disconnected from xHarbour
based upon our communications a year ago (or so).
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
>
Bill Smith-12 wrote:
>
> There must be other venues where this discussion can be conducted, (and
> I'd love to follow those threads) but my vote is to stick with
> Harbour-specific topics in the Harbour newsgroups.
>
Sorry to have intruded. I felt led to contribute per Pritpal's invitation
on
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
> In this code we have:
>lInUse := ! lInUse
> To make this code MT safe the above line has to be one atomic
> operation in xBase++. Is it true?
>
This is not true in Xbase++. Each variable access (read and write) is
serialized independently which guarantees v
I have attempted to post my Xbase++ MT knowledge on the nabble.com link you
provided. However it keeps saying that the post was not accepted by the
mail list.
As I spent some effort trying to share, can someone confirm that it is
posted for all to see or what I need to do to post it. It is som
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> Today I have posted this message on Xbase++ NG:
>
> For example, it will be interesting to have a knowledgebase
> about features and shortcomings of Xbase++ MT modal.
>
>
As a MT Xbase++ user, I have knowledge of its features and shortcommings.
1) Xbase++ is MT, but
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> And I got this reply:
>
>
> Pritpal,
>
> why should I as a Xbase++ developer help a competitor to advance its
> product???
>
>
>
Please look again at Xbase++ NG. Jan does not represent my position and
other Xbase++ users ma
