Viktor,
If you read it carefully on the link you posted:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.xharbour/browse_thread/thread/98c34c87431b30e4
there is only one person who has misunderstanding. And the very person
has already realized his mistake and apologized for the confusion he has
made
Hi Pritpal,
Thank you for your explanation. Yes, it is clear to me now.
regards,
Budyanto
On 13 Mar 2009 at 13:43, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> Hi Budiyanto, All
>
>
>
> > If you mean revising (or rewriting) GTWVW into Harbour, then I'll be very
> > much
> > interested, as well as many others. But
On 12 Mar 2009 at 12:04, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> > Please note that using CTWin like API in practice eliminates
> > SAVESCREEN/RESTSCREEN making the whole code much simpler.
> > GTWVW was addressing this aspect.
> >
>
> I never used CTWIN so cannot comment. GTWVW is aimed
> as you described but wi
Hi Pritpal,
> My question is: How many of you are using GTWVG and are
> willing to adopt to new prorocol. Believe me, it will be very
> little effort to change the exiting code but the results will be
> truely rewarding. Once this is done, I may think to port
> GTWVW in GTWVG if get a substantia
Hello Pritpal,
Congratulations!
regards,
budyanto
On 30 Jan 2009 at 16:30, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> To
> All Developers ( Past and Present )
> Who Contributed to the Project called - HARBOUR
> In Any Way
>
> I pay a deep hearted tribute and extend a bunch of THANKS.
>
> For
>
> Today, I have
Hi Pritpal, Przemek,
> I guess you want to create nested windows and you need parent window
> handle. Fine but what protection do you plan to make against destroying
> parent window with subwindow active? Can you define some expected
> behavior for such situation? What is real MS-window behavior i
After sending the following message I read Przemek's explanation which answers
all my
questions. Sorry for the noise...
regards,
budyanto
On 29 Oct 2008 at 23:43, "Harbour Project Main Develop wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
>
> Thanks for your explanation. There're still some things to clarify, if you
>
Hi Viktor,
Thanks for your explanation. There're still some things to clarify, if you
don't mind.
On 29 Oct 2008 at 7:50, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> >> You're again and again trying to add Windows
> >> specific features to GTWVT, but such things
> >> simply don't belong there. GTWVT is a console
>
Hi Viktor,
On 28 Oct 2008 at 21:27, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> But why do you need to add all these non console
> related stuff to GTWVT??
I think Pritpal is trying to get into the scheme of "inherits from GTWVT to
avoid duplicated code".
> You're again and again trying to add Windows
> specific f
On 25 Oct 2008 at 11:45, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> > Mobile device and tomorrow internet will require this capability
> > Physical area is more small that logical
> > Gt window will USE horizontal and vertical scroll bar
> > As Physical SET BY HB_GTI_SETPOS (Have 10 row ,40 column)
> > As logical
Hi Przemek,
Thanks for these GREAT innovations of yours. I am now having a big hope into
the future :-)
After learning some of your test programs, I have some notes though.
In your tests/gtwin.prg I learn this:
pGT1 := hb_gtCreate( THREAD_GT )
which opens a new GT/window.
And then later:
pGT
On 24 Oct 2008 at 22:40, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> SVN update
> https://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/harbour-project/trunk/harbour
Thanks Pritpal. That doesn't work either, but it causes me to read the doc more
carefully :-).
It turns out that the "update" command should not be foll
Hello,
I have successfully done SVN checkout (in several sessions) several days ago.
But I can't
do any SVN update ever since.
My command line:
SVN update
https://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/harbour-project/trunk
The result:
Skipped
'https://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net
On 23 Oct 2008 at 22:12, Phil Barnett wrote:
> Any other opinions?
IMHO "32/64 Bit xBase Compiler" is more appropriate than "32/64 Bit xBase
compatible
Compiler".
regards,
budyanto
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.har
On 18 Sep 2008 at 20:06, Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
> FYI, today sf.net reports Harbour in Overall Rank at position 172 and at
> 10th under Database category.
In Compilers category it's #4
http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php?form_cat=48
regards,
budyanto
Alex,
I am not a user of WriteFile(), but from a quick glance I think the current
code is OK.
The author seems to expect this:
WriteFile(hFile, cBuffer, @nNumWritten, @lOverlapped)
(only 4 parameters required, not 5).
As for the comments describing 5 parameters to pass, it is about WinAPI's
W
16 matches
Mail list logo