Re: [Harbour] Compile application hwgui using hbmk2

2009-04-13 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Leonardo, hbmk2 test1.prg test2.prg testn.prg -lmylib1 -lmylib2 -lmylibn Brgds, Viktor On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:33 AM, sygecom wrote: > > Hello, > Someone could post an example to compile using hbmk2.exe with several. PRG > and that includes only the LIB that I like. > > Leonardo Machado >

Re: [Harbour] TBrowse bug

2009-04-13 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Adam, How does it work in Clipper? Could you post a working example to demonstrate it? The one I created based on your description did the exact same thing in both Clipper and Harbour. Brgds, Viktor On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Adam Lubszczyk wrote: > > Hi! > > Make TBrowseDB with 10 ro

[Harbour] TBrowse bug

2009-04-13 Thread Adam Lubszczyk
Hi! Make TBrowseDB with 10 rows to display. Move cursor down and stay sample on 5th row. Do: DBGOTO(2) oBrows:RefreshAll() DO WHILE !oBrows:stabilize(); ENDDO TBrowsDB dispaly data from 1 to 10 records BUT cursor not move up to row 2nd (and record 2) but still stay in 5th row and record set to 5

[Harbour] EXE form Harobur on Novell Netware 4 not colsed

2009-04-13 Thread Adam Lubszczyk
Hi! I make sample EXE with Harbour and BCC55. When I copy it on server Novell Netware 4.11 and run from workstatin with Windows XP work and ending OK, but file EXE not closed (server console show so EXE is still open by workstation). How correct exit from aplication to close opened EXE ? Adam -

[Harbour] Compile application hwgui using hbmk2

2009-04-13 Thread sygecom
Hello, Someone could post an example to compile using hbmk2.exe with several. PRG and that includes only the LIB that I like. Leonardo Machado -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Compile-application-hwgui-using-hbmk2-tp23033115p23033115.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mail

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10851] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10851 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10851&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-04-14 00:02:04 + (Tue, 14 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-14 02:01 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10844] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread Viktor Szakáts
>From r10849 it's ready for testing, and feedback is now appreciated. Run this command twice: 'hbmk2 test1 test2 test3.c test4.rc test5.obj -inc' Then experiment with modifying sources. Brgds, Viktor On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Massimo Belgrano wrote: > it is a very good idea > I stay tun

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10850] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10850 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10850&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-04-13 23:32:28 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-14 01:31 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10849] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10849 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10849&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-04-13 22:45:41 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-14 00:44 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

[Harbour] User Feedback Forum

2009-04-13 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello All, Check it out if it is of any help to Harbour development. http://uservoice.com/ Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/User-Feedback-Forum-tp23027121p23027121.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10848] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10848 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10848&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-04-13 19:46:34 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-13 21:44 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10846] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Vailton, I understand your problem, and it's caused by the way hbmk2 compiles and links .rc files. It currently uses .o for the extension for compiled .rc files, which collides with compiled sources with the same filename. The .o extension is used because windres (while it also supports std .res

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10847] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10847 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10847&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-04-13 19:03:28 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-13 20:50 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10846] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread Vailton Renato
Hi Viktor! I'm using hbmk2 in all my projects and working with MinGW + Win7 I found a small problem with RC files. I created a single test in the hope of contributing to the solution of the problem .. are basically 3 files: t.prg file: function main () alert ( "Hello world!") return t.r

Re: [Harbour] Ttext mode or gui mode in final char

2009-04-13 Thread Viktor Szakáts
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Massimo Belgrano wrote: > For make a clear denomination i suggest follow naming > GTWVT : GTWVG =GTQTT GTQTG This doesn't make much sense. GTXWC, the *nix pair of GTWVT uses "C", so whichever you choose someone can be unhappy. I've decided on "C" because CUI vs.

[Harbour] Ttext mode or gui mode in final char

2009-04-13 Thread Massimo Belgrano
For make a clear denomination i suggest follow naming GTWVT : GTWVG =GTQTT GTQTG -- Massimo Belgrano ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Re: [Harbour] QT - GTQTC - Inkey():Extended Consants

2009-04-13 Thread Massimo Belgrano
AFAIK it introduce same incompatibility 2009/4/13 Pritpal Bedi : > > Hello All, > > Should I include xhb compatible inkey() extended > functionality in GTQTC ? > > IMO it should be. > > NOTE: to control it via some #define will be difficult. > > Regards > Pritpal Bedi > -- > View this message in

Re: [Harbour] QT - GTQTC - Inkey():Extended Consants

2009-04-13 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Pritpal, > Should I include xhb compatible inkey() extended > functionality in GTQTC ? > > IMO it should be. > > NOTE: to control it via some #define will be difficult. Since gtqtc is meant to be moved to core, it should behave the _exact_ same way as other core GTs. To my knowledge xhb inke

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10846] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10846 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10846&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-04-13 17:55:46 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-13 19:52 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

[Harbour] QT - GTQTC - Inkey():Extended Consants

2009-04-13 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello All, Should I include xhb compatible inkey() extended functionality in GTQTC ? IMO it should be. NOTE: to control it via some #define will be difficult. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QT---GTQTC---Inkey%28%29%3AExtended-Consants-tp23026018

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10845] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vouchcac
Revision: 10845 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10845&view=rev Author: vouchcac Date: 2009-04-13 17:49:35 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-13 10:46 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com) * harbour/contrib/gtqtc/gtqtc

Re: [Harbour] Harbour's Ready-to-Use Distro II - HarbourDev_10824_2009-04-09.exe

2009-04-13 Thread Sudip Bhattacharyya
Hello Pritpal, Thanks a lot! It's now Ok. Regards. Sudip -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Harbour%27s-Ready-to-Use-Distro-II---HarbourDev_10824_2009-04-09.exe-tp22981932p23024406.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [Harbour] Harbour's Ready-to-Use Distro II - HarbourDev_10824_2009-04-09.exe

2009-04-13 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Sudip Sudip Bhattacharyya wrote: > > I got following link error when I tried to compile demewvg (MingW) > Sorry, it is caused by an experiment left-over. Please keep only demowvg.prg in the project tree, remore all other files. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://

Re: [Harbour] RDDADS not building automatically

2009-04-13 Thread Rossine
Hello, Reading the "\harbour\install" file, I found the solution :) Best regards, Rossine. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RDDADS-not-building-automatically-tp23001243p23023120.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [Harbour] Harbour's Ready-to-Use Distro II - HarbourDev_10824_2009-04-09.exe

2009-04-13 Thread Sudip Bhattacharyya
Hello, I got following link error when I tried to compile demewvg (MingW) Project: demowvgMINGW, Environment: wvgMINGW: [1]:harbour.Exe C:\harbour_dev\dev_sources\demowvg\demowvg.prg /m /n /gc3 /w1 /es2 /a /ic:\harbour_dev\harbour\mingw\Include /d__xQT__ /oObj\demowvg.c Harbour 1.1.0dev (Rev.

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10844] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread Massimo Belgrano
it is a very good idea I stay tuned 2009/4/13 Viktor Szakáts : > I meant incremental build, but it's nothing yet, please ignore it for now. > Brgds, > Viktor > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Massimo Belgrano > wrote: >> >> What is incremental link? >> Is different from incremental compilatio

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10844] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread Viktor Szakáts
I meant incremental build, but it's nothing yet, please ignore it for now. Brgds, Viktor On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Massimo Belgrano wrote: > What is incremental link? > Is different from incremental compilation? > > > 2009/4/13 : > > Revision: 10844 > > > http://harbour-project.svn.sourc

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10844] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread Massimo Belgrano
What is incremental link? Is different from incremental compilation? 2009/4/13 : > Revision: 10844 >           > http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10844&view=rev > Author:   vszakats > Date:     2009-04-13 08:53:53 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) >    + Started -inc (incre

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10844] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10844 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10844&view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-04-13 08:53:53 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-13 10:49 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * tests/speedtst.prg !

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10838] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Thanks, I'll fix it in next commit. Brgds, Viktor On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Petr Chornyj wrote: > > > > vszakats wrote: > > > > Revision: 10838 > > > > > http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10838&view=rev > > Author: vszakats > > Date: 2009-04-11 20:01:49

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10843] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread vouchcac
Revision: 10843 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10843&view=rev Author: vouchcac Date: 2009-04-13 07:30:56 + (Mon, 13 Apr 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-04-13 12:29 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com) * harbour/contrib/gtqtc/gtqtc

[Harbour] A simple question about a hbtest result

2009-04-13 Thread Petr Chornyj
What is expected result for hbtest. Some days ago I got: Test calls failed 23 but now Test calls failed 24 It is expected? Regards, Petr -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-simple-question-about-a-hbtest-result-tp23018793p23018793.html Sent from the Harbo

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10838] trunk/harbour

2009-04-13 Thread Petr Chornyj
vszakats wrote: > > Revision: 10838 > > http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10838&view=rev > Author: vszakats > Date: 2009-04-11 20:01:49 + (Sat, 11 Apr 2009) > > Log Message: > --- > 2009-04-11 22:01 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 s