[Harbour] Re: Harbour under OS/2 - OpenWatcom

2008-11-13 Thread David Arturo Macias Corona
Przemek: >Just like David. He also removed -bt Not. -bt should be present Which I removed was osn, value used in message: "creating a (osn) executable" by default is OS/2 >> changed -5 to -5r because -5 is for 16bit code. >I think it does not cause any difference when wpp386 is used but of >

Re: [Harbour] 2008-11-12 23:16 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-11-13 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > For previous tests MSVC 2005 was used, with a local > production built Harbour (r9921), using usual HB_NO_DEBUG > switch, nothing else. I've been using memtst (with WAITs > removed) and speedtst. The machine is idle while tests are > running

Re: [Harbour] SF bugtracker#1672301: Charset Mapping CP437 or CP850 (not documentated ?)

2008-11-13 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Chen and Viktor, > I don't know the answer to this problem, but I've also > found the codepage a problem in terminals (and also > keyboard handling), so I use GTXWC and GTWVT, which are > better at solving these. Harbour in GTCRS and GTTRM supports v

Re: [Harbour] Re: Harbour under OS/2 - OpenWatcom

2008-11-13 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: Hi Maurilio, > I'think I've found something: > first of all, I started from config/win32/owatcom flags, then I had to remove > -bt=OS2 which is wrong, should be -bt=OS2V2 but this gives an undefined > function referenced error when building, so I removed

Re: [Harbour] 2008-11-12 23:16 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-11-13 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > I've just peeked into the implementation and did some tests. > New dynamic FM STAT when turned off is about 8% slower > than fully turned off FM STAT. Quite huge overhead :( Can you show me your tests? I cannot imagine such big overhead in

Re: [Harbour] new HB_ARCHITECTURE=wince ?

2008-11-13 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, Dont' you afraid that we will end with winvista, winxp, win9x, win64 and other subdirectories? No. WinCE is a different beast than the rest of the flavors, as you must know the best. We also have the special macro HB_WINCE internally for this reason. I do not agree. The difference

[Harbour] Re: Harbour under OS/2 - OpenWatcom

2008-11-13 Thread David Arturo Macias Corona
Przemek, Maurilio: I checked all compiler flags info and for us just -s is critical, rest are mainly default values Without -s MT run fine, including "speedtst.prg --scale" which based on my tests revealed problem with threads except 1 -s seem to be the end of a week plenty of tests :-) >I'th

Re: [Harbour] 2008-11-12 23:16 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-11-13 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, I've just peeked into the implementation and did some tests. New dynamic FM STAT when turned off is about 8% slower than fully turned off FM STAT. Quite huge overhead :( Looks like a few branches can make such big difference (similar to HB_NO_DEBUG). It means this isn't a costless f

Re: [Harbour] Re: Harbour under OS/2 - OpenWatcom

2008-11-13 Thread Maurilio Longo
Przemyslaw, I'think I've found something: first of all, I started from config/win32/owatcom flags, then I had to remove -bt=OS2 which is wrong, should be -bt=OS2V2 but this gives an undefined function referenced error when building, so I removed every thing, then I changed -5 to -5r because -5 is

Re: [Harbour] DBFCDX-ORDCREATE: Clipper 5.3 vs Harbour

2008-11-13 Thread Saulius Zrelskis
: 2000 ORDKEYVAL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3 CODE: 3000 ORDKEYVAL: _¦p. When dbcreate( TMP_DST, { {"CODE", "D", 8, 0} } ) append: DATE(), DATE() +1, DATE() +2 ordCreate(, "T1", "CODE", {|| DTOS(CODE)} ) Clipper: OrdKey: CODE