Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives

2008-05-07 Thread frank van nuffel
Przemek, - Original Message - From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List." Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:07 AM Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives In current PP <*id*> should work like in Clipper alloc

[Harbour] Reminder

2008-05-07 Thread Phil Barnett
This is a reminder that we are in feature lockdown at this time and are ready to release the first release candidate for Harbour Project 1.0. I will mark the files for RC1 as soon as we have a what's new file. And that is a big undertaking. I just don't want us to lose sight of why we are not at

[Harbour] ACE32 Error

2008-05-07 Thread Edmer
Hi Guys, When I run one of my ADS prg I got the following runtime error: The Ordinal 468 could not be located in the dynamic link library ACE32.DLL. Any advice please. Cheers, Ed -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ACE32-Error-tp17120163p17120163.html Sent from the Harbou

Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives

2008-05-07 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 07 May 2008, frank van nuffel wrote: Hi Frank, > indeed, and shouldn't, by all means - in the PP passes, which are ca-clipper > passes, this is sth i took care of, similarly to what you suggest below; > sorry i overlooked that this _PASS3 technique was used in an xharbour-only > PP pass,

Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives

2008-05-07 Thread frank van nuffel
Hi Przemek, - Original Message - From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List." Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:50 PM Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives On Tue, 06 May 2008, frank van nuffel wrote: [>> sn

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, Well, for me it's not a problem. Notice however that by using -q/-q0 the whole problem disappears, as none of these messages would appear on any outputs, and this is what I expect to happen in most "advanced" build environments (I may be wrong though). So, IMO, -q is what you need,

Re: [Harbour] Re: .ppo selectively skips #line ... directives

2008-05-07 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Tue, 06 May 2008, frank van nuffel wrote: Hi Frank, > Yes! great, this works fine - thx Fine, I'll commit it. > Gradually i'll explore the new pp to see whether it can replace the need for > supplementary ca-clipper pp passes, which kind of use quite a number of > hacks, which i don't expect

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Mindaugas, I do not remember the date, but we've already had discussion on exactly the same topic some time ago. I think #ifdef guarded platform dependent behaviour is the only solution, that will satisfy both DOS and Linux users. That was about the reversed nature of std/err in non-

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Alex Strickland
Szakáts Viktor wrote: What do you think? I cannot see that it is useful behaviour to emulate. Who does it help? Regards Alex ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
I'm not a DOS/Windows user and I expect that when I redirect stderr to file then for clean builds without any warning this file will be empty just like in all other compilers I'm using. I know that due to missing stderr redirection in pure DOS command.com DOS compilers were using many different ha

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 07 May 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > Well, for me it's not a problem. > Notice however that by using -q/-q0 the whole problem disappears, > as none of these messages would appear on any outputs, and > this is what I expect to happen in most "advanced" build environments > (I ma

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-04-24 21:23 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Two most important (from my point of view) features: 1) you can do drawing to pdf/png/ps/svg files and Windows DC/X-Win surface using the same interface function. You just do not need to worry if your output device is screen or pdf, etc.; 2) multiplatform. Excellent. I assume you already have

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, On 2008.05.07., at 12:46, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: I'm not a DOS/Windows user and I expect that when I redirect stderr to file then for clean builds without any warning this file will be empty just like in all other compilers I'm using. I know that due to missing stderr redirection

[Harbour] Re: Incorrect call stack at error, and recursive error

2008-05-07 Thread Miguel Angel Marchuet
Przemyslaw Czerpak escribió: On Wed, 07 May 2008, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote: It's correct. In hb_stackDispCall() (this function is used only by internal error handler) we show only pure function names without information about codeblocks source. If it's a problem then I can change it to presen

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread frank van nuffel
Thanks Victor, now i know what to look for Don't hesitate reverting as Przemek suggested, if that's what is better From here on i'll manage kind regards frank - Original Message - From: "Szakáts Viktor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 12:26 PM Subject: [Harbou

[Harbour] Re: Incorrect call stack at error, and recursive error

2008-05-07 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 07 May 2008, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote: > >It's correct. In hb_stackDispCall() (this function is used only by > >internal error handler) we show only pure function names without > >information about codeblocks source. If it's a problem then I can > >change it to present call stack just li

[Harbour] Re: Incorrect call stack at error, and recursive error

2008-05-07 Thread Miguel Angel Marchuet
It's correct. In hb_stackDispCall() (this function is used only by internal error handler) we show only pure function names without information about codeblocks source. If it's a problem then I can change it to present call stack just like in hb_vmRequestCancel(). Shows EVAL instead of ERRORDIAL

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 07 May 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor. Thanks for your modifications but: >* source/compiler/hbmain.c > * Changed output device (hb_compOutStd() -> hb_compOutErr()) >for following texts: >"Compiling..." >"No code generated" >"Lines x, Func

[Harbour] Re: Incorrect call stack at error, and recursive error

2008-05-07 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 07 May 2008, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote: > With this example we can see how call stack inform incorrect function > at harbour... It's correct. In hb_stackDispCall() (this function is used only by internal error handler) we show only pure function names without information about codeblocks

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-07 11:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * contrib/rddads/make_b32.bat * contrib/rddads/make_vc.bat * contrib/rddads/ads.ch * contrib/rddads/rddads.h * contrib/rddads/ads1.c * contrib/rddads/adsfunc.c * contrib/rddads/adsmgmnt.c + Added ACE version a

RE: [Harbour] Why harbour is name of this project?

2008-05-07 Thread Massimo Belgrano
I have very bad English. I am happy if you (or somebody) will correct my edition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harbour_compiler In Wikipedia you can do pressing the "edit this page" link in top of page -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrze

[Harbour] Incorrect call stack at error, and recursive error

2008-05-07 Thread Miguel Angel Marchuet
With this example we can see how call stack inform incorrect function at harbour... But Why recursive error is produced too? Best regards, Miguel Angel Marchuet PROCEDURE Main() #ifdef __XHARBOUR__ REQUEST HB_GT_WIN #endif ? Nil * "A" RETURN //

[Harbour] libmisc.lib hb_feof() always .t.

2008-05-07 Thread wang shuming
Hi, 28.txt file as : line1 239845 2006-12-28 06:19:06 03 0 line2 659532 2006-12-28 06:21:08 03 0 line3 928440 2006-12-28 07:24:28 03 0 line4 938007 2006-12-28 07:24:28 03 0 hfile:=hb_Fuse("a28.txt") ?hb_feof() // .t. ?hb_freadln() //line1 239845 2006-12-28 06:19:06 03 0 hb_fsk

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-04-24 21:23 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-07 Thread Szakáts Viktor
<<< Another alternative, OSS, ANSI C, with more features and only ZLIB and LIBPNG dependencies is Haru Free PDF Library (libharu) by Takeshi Kanno. This one of course needs a Harbour layer to be developed. I have found the links. Here is what I observed: 1) HahuPDF has a lot of capabilities.