On Tue Jan 8 2008, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> ChangeLog for modifications which introduce TSD support to Harbour
This sounds great!
> added support for static variables which are local to thread:
> STATIC THREAD ], ...>
There *might* be some collision with user code:
static thread;
Hi Przemek
If you remember, I had requested a feature in RDD core to accept a CARGO
parameter of type PHB_ITEM with every command responsible to create/open a
table on xHarbour ML. Is there a chance it be provided in Harbour ?
The protoype may be like:
DbCreate( ,, xCargo )
USE CARGO
Hello Viktor
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> Could you pls post the files to see what changed and how?
>
I am awaiting your reply to this effect. It is not a big deal to keep these
two files local to my own projects, but IMO, these deserve group attention
too.
Regards
Pritpal Bedi, INDIA-USA
--
Hello Przemek, Marek, Viktor
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
>> Exactly like Marek says. hb_stack*() API is not a public API, it's
>> reserved for
>> internal Harbour usage. It's needed for a proper separation of layers /
>> components.
>
> I agree. Number of public functions does not increase
Przemek
Thanks for some clarifications and excellent TWINDOW class. In my opinion
there is no harm to include this class in V1.0 if group agrees.
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
> All expressions like:
> IIF( .T., , )
> or:
> IIF( .F., , )
>
> Are fully optimized by compiler so only
I understand, thanks for the tip. I've just committed this
modification.
Something's still not right though. When compiling checkbox.prg
(the first OO code in the build process), lots of syntax errors
appear, then - after a slight pause - comes a memory allocation error:
>harbour checkbox.prg /p
2008-01-08 19:31 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* include/hbclass.ch
! Enabling HB_CLS_NO_DECORATION if compiled with HB_C52_STRICT,
since in strict mode some PP extensions required by the
decoration feature are not available.
(Thanks Przemek for the t
2008-01-08 19:31 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* include/hbclass.ch
! Enabling HB_CLS_NO_DECORATION if compiled with HB_C52_STRICT,
since in strict mode some PP extensions required by the
decoration feature are not available.
(Thanks Przemek for the t
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> You can implement this as a HB_C52_STRICT option IMO.
> (As an aside, in my last tests Harbour didn't compile
> with strict because of some OO compilation problems, but anyway).
Yes. Clipper PP does not have identifier concatenation at all.
In the momen
Hi Przemek,
In Debug console "_Rig" have NUL value.
"R_Per = _Rig + 1" return 1081 error
The 2 function are in separate file.
Now I'll make an easiest small sample.
OK, this is reduce self contain example which illustrates the
problem:
PROC MAIN()
PRIVATE p:="1"
PRIVATE p:="2"
Dne torek 8. januarja 2008 je Przemyslaw Czerpak napisal(a):
>
> Try attached pack_src.sh
>
it works!
LP, Tomaž
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Massimo Renzi (MaticaSrl) wrote:
> Hi Przemek,
> thank you for your reply.
> I would like present you my admiration of your work.
> I dont know how to say "Thank you for ever" for your great work.
> So...
> My source code is:
>
> ...
> MAN_ARCH(Dir_Work,Dir_Cont,1,10,08)
> ..
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Tomaž Zupan wrote:
> Dne torek 8. januarja 2008 je Przemyslaw Czerpak napisal(a):
> > Thank you. Your SVN does not use XML for entries files.
> > What is the number in your: .svn/format file?
> 8
Try attached pack_src.sh
best regards,
Przemek
pack_src.sh
Description: Bourne
Dne torek 8. januarja 2008 je Przemyslaw Czerpak napisal(a):
> Thank you. Your SVN does not use XML for entries files.
> What is the number in your: .svn/format file?
>
8
LP, Tomaž
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbou
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Tomaž Zupan wrote:
> Sent to your private address.
Thank you. Your SVN does not use XML for entries files.
What is the number in your: .svn/format file?
best regards,
Przemek
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
> Hi All,
> how may I use an autoincrement field ?
> I would like to have a numeric value, but at the moment if I create a dbf
> with below command, I got a datetime field.
> dbcreate( "test", { {"USERID", "+", 12, 0 }, { "NAME", C, 20, 0 } },
Dne torek 8. januarja 2008 je Przemyslaw Czerpak napisal(a):
> > There seems to be a problem with this script, because I aleays get empty
> > archive and thus make_rpm.sh script also fails.
> If it's not bug in Mandriva SED then you probably
> have repository with CRLF EOLs. How do you take it?
I
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Hi,
> Exactly like Marek says. hb_stack*() API
> is not a public API, it's reserved for
> internal Harbour usage. It's needed for a
> proper separation of layers / components.
I agree. Number of public functions does not increase
functionality but serio
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Massimo Renzi (MaticaSrl) wrote:
> Hi all.
> I'm converting Clipper project to Harbour.
> I've that problem.
> In some case Clipper developer has declared PRIVATE variable with the same
> name of PARAMETER variable.
> I know that the better think is to change the code but at
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> Though first approach decreases the quantum of redefinition of directives,
> but puts a runtime overhead to evaluate one IIF construct. Whereas in 2nd
> approach, you end up writing more directives but you save one PCODE
> evaluation at run-time.
Hi Pritp
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Tomaž Zupan wrote:
> Hi!
> There seems to be a problem with this script, because I aleays get empty
> archive and thus make_rpm.sh script also fails.
> Problem is in this line:
> for f in `sed -e '/^[ ]*name="..*"$/ !d' -e 's/^[ ]*name="\(.*\)"$/\1/g'
> $d/entries`
> Because
21 matches
Mail list logo
