Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-3.1-dev3 (more infos on the story with fd-hard-limit and systemd)

Hi Lukas ! Hi All! Below are some links and comments just to provide more information on "fd-hard-limit" default value subject :). On 11/07/2024 12:17, Lukas Tribus wrote: Hi, I will get back to this for further research and discussion in about a week. In the meantime, do we agree that the

[PATCH] DOC: install: don't reference removed CPU arg

Remove reference to the removed CPU= build argument in commit 018443b8a1 ("BUILD: makefile: get rid of the CPU variable"). --- INSTALL | 13 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL index ee91757e0..46ff3cd52 100644 --- a/INSTALL +++ b/INSTALL @

Re: [PATCH] DOC: install: don't reference removed CPU arg

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:47:50PM +, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Remove reference to the removed CPU= build argument in commit 018443b8a1 > ("BUILD: makefile: get rid of the CPU variable"). Oops, good catch, thank you Lukas! I've marked it for backporting to 3.0 as well. Now merged, thanks, Willy

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-3.1-dev3 (more infos on the story with fd-hard-limit and systemd)

Hi Valentine, hi Willy, after spending some time testing I agree tuning maxconn/fd-limits is hard ... With 8GB RAM we can still OOM with 1M FDs / 500k maxconn (no TLS), but it appears to be around the sweetspot. It thought it would require more memory considering that we suggest 1GB of memory