Hi Christopher.
Thank you for your detail review.
I will take some time for me to make the suggested changes.
Will come back to the topic as soon as I find again time to dig into it.
Best regards
Alex
On 2024-09-24 (Di.) 15:25, Christopher Faulet wrote:
Le 19/09/2024 à 13:04, Aleksandar La
Le 19/09/2024 à 13:04, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
> Hi Willy.
>
> any chance to look into the Answer?
>
Hi Alex,
I've started the review. First of all I agree with Willy. I guess it is not what
many people have in mind when they are talking about supporting configuration of
an HTTP proxy to c
Hi Christopher.
On 2024-09-19 (Do.) 16:00, Christopher Faulet wrote:
Le 19/09/2024 à 13:04, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
Hi Willy.
any chance to look into the Answer?
Hi Alex,
In fact, Willy asked me to take a look on this feature. I started to work on it
and I was distracted by the stable
Le 19/09/2024 à 13:04, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
Hi Willy.
any chance to look into the Answer?
Hi Alex,
In fact, Willy asked me to take a look on this feature. I started to work on it
and I was distracted by the stable releases and also by some tricky bugs. I'm
going to start again to rev
Hi Willy.
any chance to look into the Answer?
Regards
Alex
On 2024-08-15 (Do.) 10:55, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi Willy.
On 2024-08-12 (Mo.) 16:49, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:00:59AM +0200, Alek
Hi Willy.
On 2024-08-12 (Mo.) 16:49, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:00:59AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
The final idea is something like this.
```
tcp-request content upstream-proxy-header Host %[r
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:00:59AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > > > The final idea is something like this.
> > > >
> > > > ```
> > > > tcp-request content upstream-proxy-header Host %[req.ssl_sni,lower]
> > > > t
Hi Willy.
On 2024-08-12 (Mo.) 10:01, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Alex,
I finally found time to have a look into this!
Great :-)
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:00:59AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
The final idea is something like this.
```
tcp-request content upstream-proxy-header Host %[req.ssl
Hi Alex,
I finally found time to have a look into this!
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:00:59AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > The final idea is something like this.
> >
> > ```
> > tcp-request content upstream-proxy-header Host %[req.ssl_sni,lower]
> > tcp-request content upstream-proxy-header "
Hi.
Updated patch.
Changes:
Set the right 'X' for upstream-proxy-header
removed the upstream-proxy.png from patch
git-format against latest master
Any feedback and help is really appreciated.
Best regards
Alex
On 2024-06-13 (Do.) 03:00, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi.
New Version.
Changes:
I
Hi.
Thanks for testing and feedback.
On 2024-06-12 (Mi.) 20:35, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, at 13:04, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi.
Attached a new version with updated upstream-proxy.cfg.
This Patch have also the feature `upstream-proxy-target` to get rid of the
dependency for
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, at 13:04, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Attached a new version with updated upstream-proxy.cfg.
>
> This Patch have also the feature `upstream-proxy-target` to get rid of the
> dependency for the srv->hostname.
>
> ```
> tcp-request content upstream-proxy-target www.test1.
Hi.
Attached a new version with updated upstream-proxy.cfg.
This Patch have also the feature `upstream-proxy-target` to get rid of the
dependency for the srv->hostname.
```
tcp-request content upstream-proxy-target www.test1.com
```
Now have I tested the setup with `0.0.0.0` as server.
```
Hi Dave.
On 2024-06-12 (Mi.) 12:45, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
On 2024-06-12 (Mi.) 12:26, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024, at 22:57, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi Dave.
Thank you for your test and feedback.
When you put this line into backend, will this be better?
```
tcp-request co
On 2024-06-12 (Mi.) 12:26, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024, at 22:57, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi Dave.
Thank you for your test and feedback.
When you put this line into backend, will this be better?
```
tcp-request connection upstream-proxy-header HOST www.httpbun.com
```
Rega
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024, at 22:57, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi Dave.
>
> Thank you for your test and feedback.
>
> When you put this line into backend, will this be better?
>
> ```
> tcp-request connection upstream-proxy-header HOST www.httpbun.com
> ```
>
> Regards
> Alex
Hi Alex,
Sorry I forgot to
Hi Dave.
Thank you for your test and feedback.
When you put this line into backend, will this be better?
```
tcp-request connection upstream-proxy-header HOST www.httpbun.com
```
Regards
Alex
On 2024-06-11 (Di.) 23:52, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024, at 22:09, Aleksandar Lazic w
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024, at 22:09, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> It is now possible to set via "tcp-request connection upstream-proxy-header"
> headers for the upstream proxy
>
> ```
> tcp-request connection upstream-proxy-header Host www.test1.com
> tcp-request connection upstream-proxy-header Proxy-Auth
18 matches
Mail list logo
