Quentin,
>> > I think that's fine, as this was kind of happening before anyway,
>> > and if we can remove that IPC between main and ext through
>> > ugly glib, the better.
>>
>> Not sure I get this one. Why glib?
>
> Because of the need for integrating into the main gtk loop,
> look at the whol
Quentin,
>>> > I think that's fine, as this was kind of happening before anyway,
>>> > and if we can remove that IPC between main and ext through
>>> > ugly glib, the better.
>>>
>>> Not sure I get this one. Why glib?
>>
>> Because of the need for integrating into the main gtk loop,
>> look at
Hi,
`
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 07:47:49AM +, NRK wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 09:22:10AM +0200, g...@suckless.org wrote:
> > + if (!confirm("overwrite '%s'? ", s2)) {
> > + cp_status = 1;
>
> I missed it when reviewing the fist time, but this, I'm pretty sure is
Hi y'all,
The attached patch adds support for user styles and scripts, two WebKit
APIs for URL-based style/script injection. Mostly just parsing and
injection of those here, but also a new structure (UserContent) and a
bug:
When applying styles (old SiteSpecific ones, from styledir), current
impl
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 01:25:33AM +0200, THIBAUT AUBIN wrote:
> Thank you Quentin for raising the POSIX issue.
>
> I corrected the code to address this, the behavior is now:
> ^[yY] -> affirmative
> ^[^yY] -> negative
> e.g: cp -i: If the response from the standard input is affirmative, the
> co
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 09:22:10AM +0200, g...@suckless.org wrote:
> + if (!confirm("overwrite '%s'? ", s2)) {
> + cp_status = 1;
I missed it when reviewing the fist time, but this, I'm pretty sure is
not correct. According to POSIX:
https://pubs.opengroup
Hi y'all,
This patch introduces JavaScriptMarkup option to make sites JS-clean
without compromizing user/browser running JS for useful things.
>From f2e4f6847698feda4eadcd30dd89c30af56a4d2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artyom Bologov
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 17:54:34 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] Intro
Hey Artyom,
> What does it do exactly? I couldn't find a precise description,
>
> https://webkitgtk.org/reference/webkit2gtk/2.36.5/WebKitSettings.html#WebKitSettings--enable-javascript-markup
I had kind of the same question, but rather if you have more details
about the execution limit/domain b
Hi y'all,
This patch moves away from webext scrolling to Surf-internal JS to
scroll. See patch for more involved description and downsides.
>From 36711a5d4c7cd95d4157acba4f35ee2ac6e6a71e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artyom Bologov
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 17:48:44 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] Scroll w
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 06:02:05PM +0400, Artyom Bologov wrote:
> Hi y'all,
>
> This patch introduces JavaScriptMarkup option to make sites JS-clean
> without compromizing user/browser running JS for useful things.
>
> From f2e4f6847698feda4eadcd30dd89c30af56a4d2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 04:44:32PM +0200, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> Hey Artyom,
>
> > What does it do exactly? I couldn't find a precise description,
> >
> > https://webkitgtk.org/reference/webkit2gtk/2.36.5/WebKitSettings.html#WebKitSettings--enable-javascript-markup
>
> I had kind of the same qu
Hi Hiltjo,
> What does it do exactly? I couldn't find a precise description,
So it purges the page from everything JS-related:
> tags (ugh, this one bites,)
That sounds meh indeed.
> > I think that's fine, as this was kind of happening before anyway,
> > and if we can remove that IPC between main and ext through
> > ugly glib, the better.
>
> Not sure I get this one. Why glib?
Because of the need for integrating int
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 11:25:15AM +, NRK wrote:
> At a glance this looks okay, aside from what Quentin mentioned about
> POSIX disallowing trimming leading chars.
>
> Also it seems like your mail client is messing up the indentation. It's
> better to just attach the patch as a file. But
14 matches
Mail list logo
