Hi,
On Fri Dec 20, 2024 at 9:44 PM CET, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> Did you read my other mail about considering if we actually need these
> functions?
> I begin to consider that standard random() is good enough for our use case,
> and
> we don't need additional functions. What do you t
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 09:44:19PM +0100, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> Quoth Elie Le Vaillant :
> > ---
> > libutil/random.c | 23 +++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libutil/random.c b/libutil/random.c
> > index 72385fb..1508
Quoth Elie Le Vaillant :
> ---
> libutil/random.c | 23 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libutil/random.c b/libutil/random.c
> index 72385fb..15082e5 100644
Did you read my other mail about considering if we actually need these
functio
Quoth Elie Le Vaillant :
> ---
> libutil/random.c | 23 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libutil/random.c b/libutil/random.c
> index 72385fb..15082e5 100644
> --- a/libutil/random.c
> +++ b/libutil/random.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ rng32(void
---
libutil/random.c | 23 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libutil/random.c b/libutil/random.c
index 72385fb..15082e5 100644
--- a/libutil/random.c
+++ b/libutil/random.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ rng32(void)
}
void
-rng32_randomseed()
+rng32_see
