On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> yes, let's keep it as simple as possible. Do the others feel okay with
> adding nologin(1)?
I think it falls under the umbrella of "unix tools that are inherently
portable."
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:30:59 +0100
Petr Vaněk wrote:
Hey Petr,
> I believe that it is appropriate to describe function of -1 in man
> page, even if it effectively does nothing. It is already enumerated
> in SYNOPSIS section anyway.
yes you are right! We should do that with every undocumented fla
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> I am not 100% sure how to approach this, but -1 effectively does not do
> anything for our ls(1), except also implicitly activating the q-flag as
> mandated by Posix.
Hey Laslo,
I believe that it is appropriate to describe function
